<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapVault or SnapMirror in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69351#M16200</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, &lt;A href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/NetAppSponsoredNews/Put-Your-Snapshot-Copies-to-Work-with-SnapVault-Backup-Software/?utm_source=NETAPP&amp;amp;utm_medium=PAIDPROMO&amp;amp;utm_campaign=NetAppInsights" target="_blank"&gt; snapshot backup software&lt;/A&gt; has continued to gain share over traditional backups in recent years. This has led to NetApp being consistently rated as “Visionary” in the &lt;A href="http://www.slideshare.net/NetApp/ar-gartnermagicquadrantforenterprisebackup" target="_blank"&gt;Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery Software&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lyons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-24T21:04:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapVault or SnapMirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69336#M16197</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which is better to use for backup &amp;amp; recovery - SnapVault or SnapMirror?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69336#M16197</guid>
      <dc:creator>moffitt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:30:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault or SnapMirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69342#M16198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It depends what you are trying to achieve. On a very generic high level view, SnapVault is best for backup and archive, where as SnapMirror is best for DR and replication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:24:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69342#M16198</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriskranz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-25T22:24:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault or SnapMirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69347#M16199</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;Both are methods of replication data from source to destination.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapVault, Qtree level replication&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapMirror, volume or Qtree level replication&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapMirror, make the destination volume read/write with one command (snapmirror break)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapVault, destination volume read only&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapMirror, destination volume is the exact mirror or source volume&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;SnapVault, several versions of the source data can be kept at the destination&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;For volume SnapMirror the source and the destination volumes must be the same size&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;For SnapVault the source volume can be larger than the destination volume&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; color: #333333; font-family: &amp;amp;quot;Arial&amp;amp;quot;,&amp;amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;amp;quot;;"&gt;So both are technologies used for different scenarios. They can also be used together in one environment&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:29:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69347#M16199</guid>
      <dc:creator>arqureshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-10T00:29:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault or SnapMirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69351#M16200</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, &lt;A href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/NetAppSponsoredNews/Put-Your-Snapshot-Copies-to-Work-with-SnapVault-Backup-Software/?utm_source=NETAPP&amp;amp;utm_medium=PAIDPROMO&amp;amp;utm_campaign=NetAppInsights" target="_blank"&gt; snapshot backup software&lt;/A&gt; has continued to gain share over traditional backups in recent years. This has led to NetApp being consistently rated as “Visionary” in the &lt;A href="http://www.slideshare.net/NetApp/ar-gartnermagicquadrantforenterprisebackup" target="_blank"&gt;Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery Software&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:04:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-or-SnapMirror/m-p/69351#M16200</guid>
      <dc:creator>lyons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-24T21:04:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

