<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pros and cons of having one LUN per volume? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69536#M16245</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;De-duplication happens at the volume level, so if you have multiple luns with similar data like vm's you will save more space having them on one volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DONALD_R_GRAY</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-24T03:40:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pros and cons of having one LUN per volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69523#M16241</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When setting up LUNs for use with Vmware, what are the pros and cons of having each LUN in its own volume, please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69523#M16241</guid>
      <dc:creator>NOWNOWNOW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:55:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pros and cons of having one LUN per volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69527#M16242</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;snapshots happen at the volume level so if you have multiple LUNs in a volume they all get snapped at the same time, whether they are all consistent or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pro's of one lun/volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-----------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1:&amp;nbsp; only have to quiesce the one lun when you want to take a snapshot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2:&amp;nbsp; can use snaprestore to restore the volume quickly. (potential performance hit with single file snaprestore)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cons of one lun/volume&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;----------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1:&amp;nbsp; more complicated setup&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2:&amp;nbsp; volume count limitation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thats all i can think of for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:31:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69527#M16242</guid>
      <dc:creator>ken_foster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-06T15:31:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pros and cons of having one LUN per volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69532#M16243</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additional Pros:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Since you can prioritize I/O on a per volume basis with FlexShare (a.k.a. priority command) it is perhaps an advantage not to mix more than one LUN per volume unless they are the same "class" of I/O.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Related to other snapshot operations:&amp;nbsp; snapmirror operations to secondary storage can be differentiated a bit more on a per-lun basis. Moving luns to different aggregates can be one on a per-lun basis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Often enough, these things are just a matter of flexibility versus complexity.&amp;nbsp; As long as you aren't going to need hundreds of volumes (depending on the unit you have), one lun per volume is probably not a bad thing.&amp;nbsp; Read up on the Best Practices for setting up storage for vmware.&amp;nbsp; It can be a lot different than you think if you have used other storage systems.&amp;nbsp; Strategies like joining/concatting lots of small luns is pretty pointless on a NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 22:30:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69532#M16243</guid>
      <dc:creator>shaunjurr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-08T22:30:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pros and cons of having one LUN per volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69536#M16245</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;De-duplication happens at the volume level, so if you have multiple luns with similar data like vm's you will save more space having them on one volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Pros-and-cons-of-having-one-LUN-per-volume/m-p/69536#M16245</guid>
      <dc:creator>DONALD_R_GRAY</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-24T03:40:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

