<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Storage VMotion Causes 100% CPU utilization on Filer in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Storage-VMotion-Causes-100-CPU-utilization-on-Filer/m-p/70105#M16359</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Storage VMotion is quite intensive sequential read operation, which in turn requires a lot of CPU power on NetApp. WAFL is fragmented almost 'by definition', which is fine for random workloads. For sequential ones, a complex read-ahead caching algorithm is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can try improving things by checking &amp;amp; possibly reducing fragmentation via reallocate command.&amp;nbsp; Also, if your ONTAP version is lower than 7.3, I recommend upgrading it, as 7.3.x is more efficient with sequential reads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, FAS2050 CPU is really a slow one, I am afraid:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/message/62442#62442" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/62442#62442&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-14T20:29:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Storage VMotion Causes 100% CPU utilization on Filer</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Storage-VMotion-Causes-100-CPU-utilization-on-Filer/m-p/70100#M16356</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been having a Filer issue whenever we do any sort of large data copy on our filer.&amp;nbsp; We have a FAS2050.&amp;nbsp; We have noticed this during Exchange Snapshots and whenever we migrate a VM's storage to another datastore.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; We see 100% CPU utilization on the Filer as soon as we start the migration.&amp;nbsp; The base average on the CPU prior to the migration is 25-30%.&amp;nbsp; The datastores are iSCSI LUNS and not NFS.&amp;nbsp; It doesn't matter how much data is copied it happens for the smallest amount.&amp;nbsp; You definitely can notice a difference in performance on other VM's during this migration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We do have a ticket open but they haven't found anything yet.&amp;nbsp; Initially they said our filer is overloaded but how can it be overloaded if the CPU is only using 25-30%?&amp;nbsp; We never had this problem with an HP EVA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Storage-VMotion-Causes-100-CPU-utilization-on-Filer/m-p/70100#M16356</guid>
      <dc:creator>jgunnarson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Storage VMotion Causes 100% CPU utilization on Filer</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Storage-VMotion-Causes-100-CPU-utilization-on-Filer/m-p/70105#M16359</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Storage VMotion is quite intensive sequential read operation, which in turn requires a lot of CPU power on NetApp. WAFL is fragmented almost 'by definition', which is fine for random workloads. For sequential ones, a complex read-ahead caching algorithm is used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can try improving things by checking &amp;amp; possibly reducing fragmentation via reallocate command.&amp;nbsp; Also, if your ONTAP version is lower than 7.3, I recommend upgrading it, as 7.3.x is more efficient with sequential reads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally, FAS2050 CPU is really a slow one, I am afraid:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/message/62442#62442" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/62442#62442&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Storage-VMotion-Causes-100-CPU-utilization-on-Filer/m-p/70105#M16359</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-14T20:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

