<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which Offers Better Deduplication? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72064#M16770</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The way that you access the raw data does not effect the deduplication outcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd expect slightly worse deduplication results on an iSCSI/FCP LUN depending on the nature of the filesystem being used with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brendanheading</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-16T18:00:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which Offers Better Deduplication?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72060#M16767</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which protocol offers better or more efficient deduplication, NFS or iSCSI?&amp;nbsp; Or does it even matter? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72060#M16767</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanman2304</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which Offers Better Deduplication?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72064#M16770</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The way that you access the raw data does not effect the deduplication outcome.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd expect slightly worse deduplication results on an iSCSI/FCP LUN depending on the nature of the filesystem being used with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72064#M16770</guid>
      <dc:creator>brendanheading</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-16T18:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which Offers Better Deduplication?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72068#M16773</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know of any technical reports comparing NFS volumes to volumes with LUNs for deduplication results? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72068#M16773</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanman2304</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T22:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which Offers Better Deduplication?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72074#M16776</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The deduplication yield is a function of the kind of data being stored on the volume, not the protocol used to access it. The choice between either depends on what you're doing. Personally I try to do everything with NFS and avoid using LUNs where I can for flexibility reasons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Which-Offers-Better-Deduplication/m-p/72074#M16776</guid>
      <dc:creator>brendanheading</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-18T23:30:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

