<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Would FlashCache, formerly known as PAM, help me? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72620#M16864</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Matt,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding running the FlashCache simulation aka PCS. I haven't personally run this and I probably won;t get the chance, however I do have multiple channel partners who ask many questions around this. I have read through the TR-3801, I was wondering you you had or knew where I could potentially find an FAQ around PCS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question I have is "What is the typical/expected/estimated system overhead when running the PCS?".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I ask this, is I have a partner who has a customer running a system at nearly maximum utilisation and they was wondering whether its safe to run this PCS tool on this system or will it require 5-10% system overhead? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it depend on the ONTAP versions there running? 7.3.x vs 8.0.x vs 8.1.x vs 8.2.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any other caveats/gottcha they should look out for if and when running this tool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;Adrian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 14:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adrianlowe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-30T14:35:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Would FlashCache, formerly known as PAM, help me?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72612#M16860</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello COH-NUG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many have asked me "will FlashCache help me in my environment". Well, the answer depends on the degree to which your workload exhibits small, random reads. This, of course, begs another question: "What's does my workload exhibit?".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, now, to avoid a Catch 22 &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; , my task is to define and explain steps so that I can help you know:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How to enable the FlashCache simulator for stats enablement.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How to run perfstat for performance data gathering.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How to send to me via FTP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Wrapping up after perfstat and FlashCache efforts&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;#1 Enabling FlashCache simulation aka PCS&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TR-3801 will tell you how to use PAM II simulation. Please read : &lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/library/technical-reports/tr-3801.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/library/technical-reports/tr-3801.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;“NetApp® Predictive Cache Statistics (PCS) offer the ability to emulate large read cache sizes and to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;measure their effect on system performance. In this way PCS provides a means to approximate the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;performance gains of adding one or more Performance Acceleration Modules (PAM or PAM II) to a system.”&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;quick approach&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; might be preferred with less reading, follow these steps:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1" style="MARGIN-TOP: 0in"&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;Issue all commands on BOTH controllers, which comprise the NetApp storage cluster&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;These commands can be run via the console, telnet or ssh.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;Run “options flexscale.enable on”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;To ensure it is on run “options flexscale.enable”&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;Does it say so?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l5 level1 lfo2"&gt;You can run “stats show -p flexscale-pcs” anytime you want to monitor. Look at “reads replaced per second”. This is an optional step.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;#2 Running perfstat&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Assuming you have a NOW account, download perfstat from &lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/perfstat/perfstat7.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/perfstat/perfstat7.shtml&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Assumes you are using Data ONTAP 7 or 8.0 7-mode.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you wish to run the utility from Windows, be certain that the version of Windows you are using has rsh or ssh. Latter versions do not always have these.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Note: the perfstat needs to be run for *&lt;STRONG&gt;each&lt;/STRONG&gt;* controller, which comprises a controller&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There are many options with perfstat. In order to simplify, please follow these simple steps to monitor for 24 hour periods &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A common practice is to capture perfstat data 24 hours a day.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The recommended method for doing this is to capture multiple small samples throughout the day, rather than one 24 hour sample.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Many customers script this or place it in the cron job log.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Many customers now use WINDOWS to run perfstat. NOTE: For Windows users the example below shows a nice way to format perfstat output file names with date and time information:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 1in; TEXT-ALIGN: left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="PADDING-LEFT: 60px"&gt;-- &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;perfstat -f ___&amp;lt;hostname-of-a-controller&amp;gt;__ -t 30 -i 46 &amp;gt; perfstat-&amp;lt;hostname-of-a-controller&amp;gt;"Date_%date:~4,2%%date:~7,2%%date:~10,4%-Time_%time:~0,2%h%time:~3,2%m%time:~6,2%s"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="PADDING-LEFT: 60px"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="PADDING-LEFT: 60px"&gt;-- Don't forget to run for each controller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="PADDING-LEFT: 60px"&gt;-- Example will capture 46 samples of 30 minute intervals. This is a total of 23 hours.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="PADDING-LEFT: 60px"&gt;-- Since perfstat uses rsh commands and the time to complete the rsh's can vary, it often runs for slightly longer than the specified time. To compensate for this (and not have 2 perfstat tools running concurrently), we recommend a 23 hour run to cover a 24 hour period.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="TEXT-ALIGN: left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;#3 Sending via FTP&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;You can email the results to me. However, since these files are so large, this is usually impossible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A better approach might be to upload the resultant files to &lt;A href="http://upload.netapp.com/users%20/" target="_blank"&gt;http://upload.netapp.com/users /&lt;/A&gt; where there are simple instructions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;At this site, it may be confusing, an email address is requested. You should enter *&lt;STRONG&gt;your System Engineer's&lt;/STRONG&gt;* NetApp email address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Zip files are fine&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;#4 Wrapping Up&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1" style="MARGIN-TOP: 0in"&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo6"&gt;When finished with all of this, you can disable the FlashCache simulation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo6"&gt;Use “options flexscale.enable off” from the NetApp ONTAP command line&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo6"&gt;Your local NetApp SE will be happy to review the data and let you know if FlasCache would be of benefit.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI style="mso-list: l2 level1 lfo6"&gt;Don't forget that FlashCache is able to be tuned to specific types of data, for instance Meta Data. Ask your local SE for more info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please don’t hesitate to ask any questions. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt Kletzly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Enterprise SE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72612#M16860</guid>
      <dc:creator>kletzly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Would FlashCache, formerly known as PAM, help me?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72616#M16862</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note, this process assumes DATA ONTAP 7.3.2 or higher! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72616#M16862</guid>
      <dc:creator>kletzly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-28T17:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Would FlashCache, formerly known as PAM, help me?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72620#M16864</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Matt,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding running the FlashCache simulation aka PCS. I haven't personally run this and I probably won;t get the chance, however I do have multiple channel partners who ask many questions around this. I have read through the TR-3801, I was wondering you you had or knew where I could potentially find an FAQ around PCS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The question I have is "What is the typical/expected/estimated system overhead when running the PCS?".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason I ask this, is I have a partner who has a customer running a system at nearly maximum utilisation and they was wondering whether its safe to run this PCS tool on this system or will it require 5-10% system overhead? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it depend on the ONTAP versions there running? 7.3.x vs 8.0.x vs 8.1.x vs 8.2.x&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any other caveats/gottcha they should look out for if and when running this tool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;Adrian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 14:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72620#M16864</guid>
      <dc:creator>adrianlowe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-30T14:35:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Would FlashCache, formerly known as PAM, help me?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72624#M16866</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adrian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="p1"&gt;NetApp recommends issuing this command through an SSH connection and logging the output throughout the observation period because you want to capture and observe the peak performance of the system and the cache. This output can also be easily imported into spreadsheet software, graphed, and so on. A second SSH can be used to capture the output of the &lt;EM&gt;sysstat&lt;/EM&gt; command. The combination of these two data points, PCS-specific and system data, lets you know what is happening on the system and how the emulated cache that PCS is presenting would handle the workload. PCS will run on any system capable of having FlashCache installed and will not impact the current system performance while running. PCS can be run on systems starting with ONTAP 7.3.2 and up to all current versions including Clustered ONTAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kent Orso&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Commercial SE&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Would-FlashCache-formerly-known-as-PAM-help-me/m-p/72624#M16866</guid>
      <dc:creator>korso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-04T12:10:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

