<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Protection Mgr Preferred Interfaces (SnapVault using FC) in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Mgr-Preferred-Interfaces-SnapVault-using-FC/m-p/76964#M17957</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to determine whether or not protection manager preferred interfaces can be used as a workaround in forcing SnapVault to leverage FC rather than IP links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The effort is necessary to satisfy a customer requirement of using FC for replication and backup and recovery. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was advised the following would accommodate this requirement but I have been unable to verify its viability. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Arial Narrow;"&gt;"You set the hostPreferredAddr1 and hostPreferredAddr2 options for the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Arial Narrow;"&gt;&amp;gt; two hosts and that will tell us to use the FC ports, not the default &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; sans-serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; Arial Narrow&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; color: #000000; font-size: 11pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; "&gt;&amp;gt; Ethernet port"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; Times New Roman&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; "&gt;Having reviewed tr-3560. The document seems to indicate the SnapVault is controlled (from ProtMgr) with the ndmpd.preferred_interface parameter. SnapMirror is controlled using the&lt;BR /&gt;hostPreferredAddr1 and hostPreferredAddr2 options. By implication then these parameters would override the ndmpd.preferred.interface option that controls or directs SnapVault? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; Times New Roman&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; "&gt;Your assistance is really appreciated. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>byermann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:20:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Protection Mgr Preferred Interfaces (SnapVault using FC)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Mgr-Preferred-Interfaces-SnapVault-using-FC/m-p/76964#M17957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to determine whether or not protection manager preferred interfaces can be used as a workaround in forcing SnapVault to leverage FC rather than IP links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The effort is necessary to satisfy a customer requirement of using FC for replication and backup and recovery. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was advised the following would accommodate this requirement but I have been unable to verify its viability. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Arial Narrow;"&gt;"You set the hostPreferredAddr1 and hostPreferredAddr2 options for the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="MsoPlainText" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: Arial Narrow;"&gt;&amp;gt; two hosts and that will tell us to use the FC ports, not the default &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; sans-serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; Arial Narrow&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt; color: #000000; font-size: 11pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; "&gt;&amp;gt; Ethernet port"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; Times New Roman&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; "&gt;Having reviewed tr-3560. The document seems to indicate the SnapVault is controlled (from ProtMgr) with the ndmpd.preferred_interface parameter. SnapMirror is controlled using the&lt;BR /&gt;hostPreferredAddr1 and hostPreferredAddr2 options. By implication then these parameters would override the ndmpd.preferred.interface option that controls or directs SnapVault? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style=": ; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; Times New Roman&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; font-family: &amp;amp;quot; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; serif&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; "&gt;Your assistance is really appreciated. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Mgr-Preferred-Interfaces-SnapVault-using-FC/m-p/76964#M17957</guid>
      <dc:creator>byermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:20:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Mgr Preferred Interfaces (SnapVault using FC)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Mgr-Preferred-Interfaces-SnapVault-using-FC/m-p/76968#M17958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fot SnapVault preffered interface, the settings (options) should be specified on the filer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NDMP.preferred_insterface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once the option is set, you need to check the value of DFM option "ndmpDataUseAllInterfaces"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dfm options list ndmpDataUseAllInterfaces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the value is 1 set it to 0/no (dfm options set ndmpDataUseAllInterfaces=no)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shiva Raja&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Mgr-Preferred-Interfaces-SnapVault-using-FC/m-p/76968#M17958</guid>
      <dc:creator>rshiva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-15T05:06:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

