<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Microsoft initiated ISCSI LUNS snapshot-SMVI in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Microsoft-initiated-ISCSI-LUNS-snapshot-SMVI/m-p/77201#M17987</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp; per SMVI(Snap Manager for Virtual Infrastruture) documentation its been&amp;nbsp; confirmed that Vmware &amp;amp; NetApp do not support taking snapshot of&amp;nbsp; Microsoft initaited ISCSI Luns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know how to&amp;nbsp; overcome this issue. Is there any alternative way we can take the VM&amp;nbsp; consistant snapshot of Microsoft initaited ISCSI Luns.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shabeer.k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shabeer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:58:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft initiated ISCSI LUNS snapshot-SMVI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Microsoft-initiated-ISCSI-LUNS-snapshot-SMVI/m-p/77201#M17987</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp; per SMVI(Snap Manager for Virtual Infrastruture) documentation its been&amp;nbsp; confirmed that Vmware &amp;amp; NetApp do not support taking snapshot of&amp;nbsp; Microsoft initaited ISCSI Luns.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know how to&amp;nbsp; overcome this issue. Is there any alternative way we can take the VM&amp;nbsp; consistant snapshot of Microsoft initaited ISCSI Luns.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shabeer.k&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Microsoft-initiated-ISCSI-LUNS-snapshot-SMVI/m-p/77201#M17987</guid>
      <dc:creator>shabeer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Microsoft initiated ISCSI LUNS snapshot-SMVI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Microsoft-initiated-ISCSI-LUNS-snapshot-SMVI/m-p/77206#M17988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you trying to use SMVI for this still, or any other way? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could use Ontap snapshots but they cant guarantee data consistency the way SMVI will. This is because&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMVI get vcenter to quiesce filesystem before taking a snapshot. That will not happen if you take an Ontap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snapshot though. So this is more risky and might not even work. So why bother? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:06:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Microsoft-initiated-ISCSI-LUNS-snapshot-SMVI/m-p/77206#M17988</guid>
      <dc:creator>eric_barlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-17T07:06:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

