<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Have anybody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system or is it impossible? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8517#M1947</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anbody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to backup our files from the prim-system to a sec-system with snapvault.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But we heard that is not secure, because there is no media break and snapvault will transfere a logical failure to the sec-system if there is one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We heard that snapvault don't transfere the WAFL-pointer, the sec-system makes new one, so it's not possible to transfere logical failures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ZOLLNET9999</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:33:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Have anybody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system or is it impossible?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8517#M1947</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have anbody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to backup our files from the prim-system to a sec-system with snapvault.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But we heard that is not secure, because there is no media break and snapvault will transfere a logical failure to the sec-system if there is one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We heard that snapvault don't transfere the WAFL-pointer, the sec-system makes new one, so it's not possible to transfere logical failures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:33:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8517#M1947</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZOLLNET9999</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:33:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Have anybody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system or is it impossible?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8523#M1950</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would say this sounds like a competitor's FUD &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="cool" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_macro_emoticon jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/cool.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, you can argue that if you have two different technology stacks at source &amp;amp; backup destination, it *may* be more resilient - but realistically SnapVault is a very robust way of backing up data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:30:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8523#M1950</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-26T13:30:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Have anybody heard about data corruption transfer with snapvault to the sec-system or is it impossible?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8530#M1952</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapVault creates an exact read-only copy of a source volume or primary qtree to a destination qtree.&amp;nbsp; SnapVault does not guarantee consistency at the time of the transfer unless you use SnapDrive, SnapManager in conjunction with SnapDrive or a custom script that either places the database in a hot backup mode or flushes writes to disk before the snapshot is taken to be used as the baseline for the next replication.&amp;nbsp; I highly recommend reading the Best Practices for SnapVault (TR-3487) for more information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:40:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Have-anybody-heard-about-data-corruption-transfer-with-snapvault-to-the-sec/m-p/8530#M1952</guid>
      <dc:creator>WOODROGER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-26T15:40:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

