<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic dedicated root aggregate in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98683#M20016</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Hello&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I really don’t understand why we need to have dedicated disks, Raid and aggregate for the root-data in FAS8xxx clustered mode.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Dedicated raid root aggregates for each node of a Clustered Data ONTAP cluster is a huge waste of disk space, spindles, shelf space and our money. And for what? For containing the log files. Even not the OS core files.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;This is unreasonable and annoying.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I will love to read your comments on this subject, as for now, I am not going to pay it.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>superderivatives</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:21:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>dedicated root aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98683#M20016</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Hello&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I really don’t understand why we need to have dedicated disks, Raid and aggregate for the root-data in FAS8xxx clustered mode.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Dedicated raid root aggregates for each node of a Clustered Data ONTAP cluster is a huge waste of disk space, spindles, shelf space and our money. And for what? For containing the log files. Even not the OS core files.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;This is unreasonable and annoying.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I will love to read your comments on this subject, as for now, I am not going to pay it.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98683#M20016</guid>
      <dc:creator>superderivatives</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dedicated root aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98684#M20017</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm with you brother.&amp;nbsp; I have root taking up 18TB of disks (3TBx3x2) on one of my pairs.&amp;nbsp; That's a lot of capacity I could use elsewhere.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The advanced partitioning in 8.3 solves this problem, but apparently only in 2500 series and all-flash configurations.&amp;nbsp; I don't know why this isn't the solution for all models, but maybe if we make enough noise....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98684#M20017</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-23T09:49:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dedicated root aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98703#M20018</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I remember back in the day reading that if there's some type of corruption in the aggregate&amp;nbsp;and the system has to do a chkdsk it would take the controller down, because the root is on the same aggregate as the data. So separating&amp;nbsp;the root vol out to its own aggregate would minimize that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I personally have never placed the root volume on its own aggregate and haven't had an issue in 5 years of working with NetApp storage. Haven't heard of any customers I've spoken with have an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98703#M20018</guid>
      <dc:creator>cgeck0000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-23T18:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: dedicated root aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98713#M20019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;Still doesn’t make sense.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;The OS is on the flash card. Only the logs and maybe configuration files are on the root vol. why not extending the flash card with +50GB?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;They do have a partial solution with the 2xxx series: partitioning. Why not do it for the 8xxx too?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;In my case I am wasting 3x900GB disks space per controller. (imagine you have 8 filers in a cluster. huge waste of space, spindles and money)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 05:29:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/dedicated-root-aggregate/m-p/98713#M20019</guid>
      <dc:creator>superderivatives</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-24T05:29:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

