<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SnapVault question: Should snapshots be disabled on destination volume? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98788#M20044</link>
    <description>Hi My environment is: 2 x FAS3240 controllers running 8.1.3 7-mode My question is: Should snapshots be disabled on a volume that is being used as the destination of two SnapVault relationships? I am asking because I often see messages such as "Destination requested snapshot that does not exist on the source" . Running a "snapvault update" from CLI gets the relationship back in sync but I wondered if having snapshots enabled (with the default 0 2 6 pattern) could be causing problems?? Regards, Richard.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:20:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapVault question: Should snapshots be disabled on destination volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98788#M20044</link>
      <description>Hi My environment is: 2 x FAS3240 controllers running 8.1.3 7-mode My question is: Should snapshots be disabled on a volume that is being used as the destination of two SnapVault relationships? I am asking because I often see messages such as "Destination requested snapshot that does not exist on the source" . Running a "snapvault update" from CLI gets the relationship back in sync but I wondered if having snapshots enabled (with the default 0 2 6 pattern) could be causing problems?? Regards, Richard.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98788#M20044</guid>
      <dc:creator>rh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:20:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault question: Should snapshots be disabled on destination volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98789#M20045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so a few things.. &amp;nbsp; How are you doing your snapvaults, are you having DFM protection manager control your policies, or are you doing them directly from the command line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per the snapvault best practice guide, all destination snaps should be disabled, snap sched volname 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snapvaults should be controlling when the snapshot gets taken, that's how it works.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so for example, a snapvault that is controled from DFM initiates a snapvault transfer and then takes an preserves a snapshot based on the policy you set.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you aren't using DFM, then it's done from the CLI with retention policy. &amp;nbsp;The whole point of snapvault is that it replicates data and then takes a snapshot... volume snapshots on the destination via snap sched are not a good idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98789#M20045</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-31T17:14:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault question: Should snapshots be disabled on destination volume?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98804#M20049</link>
      <description>JGPSHNTAP, many thanks for the clear response. As the "pattern" of snapshots on the destination volume is the default one, I was guessing that whoever set up the volume just "went with the defaults". Happy New Year, Richard.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 09:35:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-question-Should-snapshots-be-disabled-on-destination-volume/m-p/98804#M20049</guid>
      <dc:creator>rh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-02T09:35:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

