<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cluster Mode SNMP Monitoring SnapMirror Lag in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/98980#M20108</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i'm trying to monitor the snapmirror relationship lagtime with a snmp monitoring-tool. While setting up the configuration, i discovered to use following OID:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;snapmirror rel lag&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When i'm executing a snmpwalk against this OID, i'm getting back every single snapmirror relationship with the actuall lagtime:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------------------- New Test -----------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1.3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : Device: xx.xx.xx.xx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : SNMP V2c&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (274 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4 = "7913500"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:03 (555 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.5 = "7913500"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:03 (839 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.6 = "7913600"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when i try to get the lagtime for only one snapmirror relationship and use the unique OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4 ", i'm receiving follwoing error:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------------------- New Test -----------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1.3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (7 ms) : Device: xx.xx.xx.xx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (10 ms) : SNMP V2c&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (13 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (28 ms) : -------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (32 ms) : Value: No such instance (SNMP error # 223)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (35 ms) : Done&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a known issue or normal?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Karl_Haudeck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:20:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cluster Mode SNMP Monitoring SnapMirror Lag</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/98980#M20108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i'm trying to monitor the snapmirror relationship lagtime with a snmp monitoring-tool. While setting up the configuration, i discovered to use following OID:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;snapmirror rel lag&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When i'm executing a snmpwalk against this OID, i'm getting back every single snapmirror relationship with the actuall lagtime:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------------------- New Test -----------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1.3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : Device: xx.xx.xx.xx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : SNMP V2c&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (1 ms) : Walk 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:02 (274 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4 = "7913500"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:03 (555 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.5 = "7913500"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:14:03 (839 ms) : 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.6 = "7913600"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when i try to get the lagtime for only one snapmirror relationship and use the unique OID "1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4 ", i'm receiving follwoing error:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;----------------------- New Test -----------------------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Paessler SNMP Tester 5.1.3&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (7 ms) : Device: xx.xx.xx.xx&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (10 ms) : SNMP V2c&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (13 ms) : Custom OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.789.1.29.1.1.7.4&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (28 ms) : -------&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (32 ms) : Value: No such instance (SNMP error # 223)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;07.01.2015 16:56:33 (35 ms) : Done&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this a known issue or normal?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/98980#M20108</guid>
      <dc:creator>Karl_Haudeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:20:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster Mode SNMP Monitoring SnapMirror Lag</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/99167#M20171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Same thing here running 8.2.1P2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Walk gives&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.3 = Timeticks: (22200) 0:03:42.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.5 = Timeticks: (22300) 0:03:43.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.6 = Timeticks: (3592000) 9:58:40.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.7 = Timeticks: (3592200) 9:58:42.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.8 = Timeticks: (1697300) 4:42:53.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.12 = Timeticks: (276500) 0:46:05.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.13 = Timeticks: (2975700) 8:15:57.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.14 = Timeticks: (1697400) 4:42:54.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.15 = Timeticks: (276500) 0:46:05.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.16 = Timeticks: (2975700) 8:15:57.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.17 = Timeticks: (2982900) 8:17:09.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.18 = Timeticks: (11768400) 1 day, 8:41:24.00
NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.19 = Timeticks: (1698300) 4:43:03.00&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;try to query first instance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;NETAPP-MIB::snapmirrorRelLag.3 = No Such Instance currently exists at this OID&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/99167#M20171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-12T10:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cluster Mode SNMP Monitoring SnapMirror Lag</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/103935#M21106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Karl,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using a cheap application that collects tons of perfomance data. There are 100's of metrics and this tool grabs most of them. Check out Arxscan.com&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 20:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cluster-Mode-SNMP-Monitoring-SnapMirror-Lag/m-p/103935#M21106</guid>
      <dc:creator>MBB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-29T20:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

