<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IOmeter Cache only benchmark performance in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/IOmeter-Cache-only-benchmark-performance/m-p/99142#M20169</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All&lt;BR /&gt;I am looking for some feedback regarding benchmark testing on our new Netapp FAS2552 running 8.2RC17 Mode 7 with Vmware using Iscsi &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have connected the Netapp to Vmware ESXi 5.5 with a 10gb connection from the SAN to the switch and from the switch to the host. &amp;nbsp;I set up iometre to &amp;nbsp;test using using 4k blocks in sequential reads with outstanding IOPs at 16. I have limited the sample size 100mb, this effectively is making a cache run from the SAN and I have confirmed the read has 100% hit rate.&lt;BR /&gt;. &amp;nbsp;I am surprised to see that the maximum number of iop,s is only 20,000 with less than 90 MB-s being utilised. &amp;nbsp;I would have thought if the Netapp was serving 100% from cache memory the iop,s level would be significantly higher. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I have also benchmarked against a LUN from the Netapp directly into the Windows 2008 OS using the software initiator within the Windows operating system. &amp;nbsp;I am seeing very similar performance. &amp;nbsp;Given the fact that everything is being served from cache, does it seem right for iop,s at this level? &amp;nbsp;Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James_Sillett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:19:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IOmeter Cache only benchmark performance</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/IOmeter-Cache-only-benchmark-performance/m-p/99142#M20169</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All&lt;BR /&gt;I am looking for some feedback regarding benchmark testing on our new Netapp FAS2552 running 8.2RC17 Mode 7 with Vmware using Iscsi &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have connected the Netapp to Vmware ESXi 5.5 with a 10gb connection from the SAN to the switch and from the switch to the host. &amp;nbsp;I set up iometre to &amp;nbsp;test using using 4k blocks in sequential reads with outstanding IOPs at 16. I have limited the sample size 100mb, this effectively is making a cache run from the SAN and I have confirmed the read has 100% hit rate.&lt;BR /&gt;. &amp;nbsp;I am surprised to see that the maximum number of iop,s is only 20,000 with less than 90 MB-s being utilised. &amp;nbsp;I would have thought if the Netapp was serving 100% from cache memory the iop,s level would be significantly higher. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I have also benchmarked against a LUN from the Netapp directly into the Windows 2008 OS using the software initiator within the Windows operating system. &amp;nbsp;I am seeing very similar performance. &amp;nbsp;Given the fact that everything is being served from cache, does it seem right for iop,s at this level? &amp;nbsp;Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:19:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/IOmeter-Cache-only-benchmark-performance/m-p/99142#M20169</guid>
      <dc:creator>James_Sillett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:19:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

