<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic sql server sequential writes netapp in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99909#M20305</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys! Can you please help to understand if it is normal behavior or not?&lt;BR /&gt;I have fas3220, on this fas there is a lun on aggregate with 57 disks and no application loads it.&lt;BR /&gt;hosts connected to fas over fcoe, version of OS 8.2P3 7-MODE&lt;BR /&gt;I wand to place on this lun high loaded database which is high on transaction log writes.&lt;BR /&gt;So i decided to test this lun on sequenctial 8k writes with iometer and compare to local drive performance -&lt;BR /&gt;all iometer settings that i changed and results you can find on screenshots in attachments.&lt;BR /&gt;results of this tests are amazing&lt;BR /&gt;Local drive(600 Gb 15k SAS raid 1) shows us 11000 IOPS, but fas3220 lun only 1400.&lt;BR /&gt;And my reasonable question - why is so drastic difference, why local drive so much outperform fas3230? is it normal?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ache</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:12:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>sql server sequential writes netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99909#M20305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys! Can you please help to understand if it is normal behavior or not?&lt;BR /&gt;I have fas3220, on this fas there is a lun on aggregate with 57 disks and no application loads it.&lt;BR /&gt;hosts connected to fas over fcoe, version of OS 8.2P3 7-MODE&lt;BR /&gt;I wand to place on this lun high loaded database which is high on transaction log writes.&lt;BR /&gt;So i decided to test this lun on sequenctial 8k writes with iometer and compare to local drive performance -&lt;BR /&gt;all iometer settings that i changed and results you can find on screenshots in attachments.&lt;BR /&gt;results of this tests are amazing&lt;BR /&gt;Local drive(600 Gb 15k SAS raid 1) shows us 11000 IOPS, but fas3220 lun only 1400.&lt;BR /&gt;And my reasonable question - why is so drastic difference, why local drive so much outperform fas3230? is it normal?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99909#M20305</guid>
      <dc:creator>ache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:12:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sql server sequential writes netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99915#M20307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You should throw some SSDs there&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;like something below....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr_name&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; flash_pool?&amp;nbsp; #_of_HDD&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; #_of_SDD&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; #_of_ops_actual&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; #_of_ops_possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; n&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 56&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7480&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;aggr2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; y&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 56&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4000&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 31480&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:48:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99915#M20307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uddhav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-29T12:48:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sql server sequential writes netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99992#M20318</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it is not so obvious about ssd. On local disk i just have sas 15 k hdd - and it is faster&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/sql-server-sequential-writes-netapp/m-p/99992#M20318</guid>
      <dc:creator>ache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-30T11:55:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

