<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Recommendation for Link Aggregation with iSCSI in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Recommendation-for-Link-Aggregation-with-iSCSI/m-p/100837#M20452</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using a FAS6240 with iSCSI only, connecting to a Cisco Nexus 7000 series switch. &amp;nbsp;A few questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-How many cables should iSCSI use from the array to the switch, 2 or 4?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-What link aggregation should I use form the array to the switch, LACP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-How many IP addresses should be used on the array for iSCSI connections - 1 or 2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CLOUDMINER</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:03:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommendation for Link Aggregation with iSCSI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Recommendation-for-Link-Aggregation-with-iSCSI/m-p/100837#M20452</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm using a FAS6240 with iSCSI only, connecting to a Cisco Nexus 7000 series switch. &amp;nbsp;A few questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-How many cables should iSCSI use from the array to the switch, 2 or 4?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-What link aggregation should I use form the array to the switch, LACP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-How many IP addresses should be used on the array for iSCSI connections - 1 or 2?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Recommendation-for-Link-Aggregation-with-iSCSI/m-p/100837#M20452</guid>
      <dc:creator>CLOUDMINER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommendation for Link Aggregation with iSCSI</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Recommendation-for-Link-Aggregation-with-iSCSI/m-p/100922#M20473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Personally not a big fan of Link aggregation, normally i would use MPIO for this, takes out any issues with aggreagting NICS and swtich ports to make this work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then i look at why i'm doing this, for performance or resillience, if resilliences, multiple connections into multiple switches at both host and controller end, so i can survive device failures across mutliple devices (Server NIC, Switch, Controller NIC) without service interruption.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't know if that helps, but that would be the way i'd do that normally.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:24:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Recommendation-for-Link-Aggregation-with-iSCSI/m-p/100922#M20473</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulstringfellow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-23T10:24:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

