<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Good or bad experience with &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; patches in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Good-or-bad-experience-with-quot-D-quot-patches/m-p/101292#M20525</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are new to the NetApp world having just migrated our CIFS data over from EMC Celerra. We have uncovered a bug in c-mode 8.2.2 and are in the process of requesting something called a 'D Patch' from engineering. Supposidly engineering will create a one-off patch for us to fix the bug. Just wondering if anyone has had any good or bad experiences with 'D Patches'.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MadSANMan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:58:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Good or bad experience with "D" patches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Good-or-bad-experience-with-quot-D-quot-patches/m-p/101292#M20525</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are new to the NetApp world having just migrated our CIFS data over from EMC Celerra. We have uncovered a bug in c-mode 8.2.2 and are in the process of requesting something called a 'D Patch' from engineering. Supposidly engineering will create a one-off patch for us to fix the bug. Just wondering if anyone has had any good or bad experiences with 'D Patches'.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:58:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Good-or-bad-experience-with-quot-D-quot-patches/m-p/101292#M20525</guid>
      <dc:creator>MadSANMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:58:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

