<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Best practice max number of drives in an aggregate? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Best-practice-max-number-of-drives-in-an-aggregate/m-p/101338#M20537</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have huge aggregates. Well, huge to me anyway. They have over 200 drives in them. In technical discussions with Netapp engineering I am&amp;nbsp;getting mixed advice. Some say "Yes! Big aggregates are the way to go!" and others say , "Yes, big aggregates! But wait, the performance benefits of multiple spindles taper off drastically after about 54 drives" I have a one time opportunity to reconfigure my SAN and redo all of the aggregates. I have not found any written best practices that discuss the max spindle count, only the max size. Any assistance sorting&amp;nbsp;this out would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment: cDOT 8.2 (going to 8.3) on 6240&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaulLemmons</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:57:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best practice max number of drives in an aggregate?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Best-practice-max-number-of-drives-in-an-aggregate/m-p/101338#M20537</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have huge aggregates. Well, huge to me anyway. They have over 200 drives in them. In technical discussions with Netapp engineering I am&amp;nbsp;getting mixed advice. Some say "Yes! Big aggregates are the way to go!" and others say , "Yes, big aggregates! But wait, the performance benefits of multiple spindles taper off drastically after about 54 drives" I have a one time opportunity to reconfigure my SAN and redo all of the aggregates. I have not found any written best practices that discuss the max spindle count, only the max size. Any assistance sorting&amp;nbsp;this out would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment: cDOT 8.2 (going to 8.3) on 6240&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:57:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Best-practice-max-number-of-drives-in-an-aggregate/m-p/101338#M20537</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulLemmons</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:57:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best practice max number of drives in an aggregate?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Best-practice-max-number-of-drives-in-an-aggregate/m-p/101641#M20590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would be interested in having further information about this topic ,&amp;nbsp; aggregates and Flexvols&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Best-practice-max-number-of-drives-in-an-aggregate/m-p/101641#M20590</guid>
      <dc:creator>darrendu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-10T20:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

