<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102494#M20800</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;1. not a problem. snapmirror will continue without an issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. no. you need to break and then move (or clone)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. impossible (AFAIK). different OS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JSHACHER11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-30T16:17:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102493#M20799</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to migrate multiple volumes(~8PB total) that are in snapmirror relationships. Currently running 8.2.2 for reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.When migrating the ‘source’ volume to a new aggregate will the snapmirror relationship still work after the move has finished? If it does break, what things will I need to do in order to fix it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Considerations:&lt;BR /&gt;-The volume mirrors only once every 3 hours and there should be hardly any changes if any at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-All source volumes are served via nfs, but not frequently accessed as this is primary archive data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;2.) Can I use ‘volume move’ to migrate the ‘destination’ sides of the snapmirror relationship? The replication side is getting higher density disks as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;3.) Any known issues involving ‘volume move’ from FAS hardware to E-series?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102493#M20799</guid>
      <dc:creator>parkesje1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:42:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102494#M20800</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1. not a problem. snapmirror will continue without an issue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. no. you need to break and then move (or clone)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. impossible (AFAIK). different OS&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102494#M20800</guid>
      <dc:creator>JSHACHER11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-30T16:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102499#M20801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the response. So for the E-series hardware I'm planning to add it to the cluster with new 8080 heads and migrate data via 'volume move' to the e-series hardware.&amp;nbsp; At this point I know that I can add E-series to our cluster with the 'flex array' license'.&amp;nbsp; However since I've never dealt with this configuration before I'm not clear on what Ontap commands will work with the underlying E-series storage that uses (Santricity OS). The main thing we want though is for snapmirror to work between from FAS -&amp;gt; E-series and hopefully the 'volume move' command for the migrations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102499#M20801</guid>
      <dc:creator>parkesje1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-30T16:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102508#M20803</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;If you are virtualizing the E-series behind the FlexArray license - you don't need to worry about what you can and can't do in Data OnTAP. &amp;nbsp;The virtualized LUNs from the E-series appear as disks to the Filers, from which you build aggregates. &amp;nbsp;After that, everything is the same. &amp;nbsp;That's what FlexArray (f.k.a. V-series controllers) is designed to do. &amp;nbsp;The fact that the actual physical storage is on a different platform or controlled with a different OS is completely hidden to you once you get to the aggregate level.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There are differences in managing the "disks" themselves between native and virtualized and an aggregate built from virutalized disks is RAID-0 instead of RAID-DP (the backend storage manages the RAID independently) but all the usual stuff&amp;nbsp;- operations/capabilities - is&amp;nbsp;the same. &amp;nbsp;A volume is a volume on whichever aggregate it is stored.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 18:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102508#M20803</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobshouseofcards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-30T18:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Questions regarding ‘volume move’ and snapmirror relationships in CDOT</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102586#M20824</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was an excellent suggestion&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Questions-regarding-volume-move-and-snapmirror-relationships-in-CDOT/m-p/102586#M20824</guid>
      <dc:creator>USCadmin909</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-31T19:42:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

