<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103516#M21027</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;-&amp;gt; Site-Failover of an a&lt;SPAN&gt;symmetrical mirroring&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if this occurs (e.g. controller A fails) and controller B have no access to a certain aggregat&amp;nbsp;of controller A at this time, a kernel panic is possible. right ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HolgerDD</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-21T15:49:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103234#M20962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;following situation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) MC with 8.2.3 7-Mode&lt;BR /&gt;2) each site&lt;BR /&gt;aggr0 mirrored&lt;BR /&gt;aggr1 not mirrored&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's possible to suppress a takeover only for aggr1 during failover?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103234#M20962</guid>
      <dc:creator>HolgerDD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T08:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103235#M20963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No. Filer will configure all aggregates it sees.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 08:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103235#M20963</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-15T08:30:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103513#M21025</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the reason for your question ? Maintenance ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you mean a normal Failover&amp;nbsp;or a Site-Failover ? In a normal takeover the aggregate is still available, but in a Site-Failover the aggregate can't be used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1210206/html/GUID-9294CE2D-F12C-49C7-9F05-F858392A2669.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1210206/html/GUID-9294CE2D-F12C-49C7-9F05-F858392A2669.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103513#M21025</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcSchindler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-21T15:14:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103516#M21027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;-&amp;gt; Site-Failover of an a&lt;SPAN&gt;symmetrical mirroring&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if this occurs (e.g. controller A fails) and controller B have no access to a certain aggregat&amp;nbsp;of controller A at this time, a kernel panic is possible. right ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103516#M21027</guid>
      <dc:creator>HolgerDD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-21T15:49:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103541#M21031</link>
      <description>It should not panic. Some aggregates will be missing after takeover, that's all. Of course if root aggregate itself is missing, no takeover is possible.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 04:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/103541#M21031</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-22T04:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: suppress takeover for certain aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/109441#M23142</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It should not panic, especially if the release version is equal or above 7.1.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you have the problem after a takeover ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:51:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/suppress-takeover-for-certain-aggregate/m-p/109441#M23142</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcSchindler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-10T12:51:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

