<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Maximum aggr size for 8.3 FAS8040 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103806#M21074</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Have 3 SATA 4246 disk shelves, all 3TB drives.&amp;nbsp; The main purpose of his new FAS8040 is for hosting virtual machines.&amp;nbsp; To simplify my end, really thinking about 1 aggregrate.&amp;nbsp; With 8.3, what is the max size and # of disks allowed?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's requirements of the System Aggregrate while I'm at it &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>npingl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:29:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maximum aggr size for 8.3 FAS8040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103806#M21074</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have 3 SATA 4246 disk shelves, all 3TB drives.&amp;nbsp; The main purpose of his new FAS8040 is for hosting virtual machines.&amp;nbsp; To simplify my end, really thinking about 1 aggregrate.&amp;nbsp; With 8.3, what is the max size and # of disks allowed?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's requirements of the System Aggregrate while I'm at it &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103806#M21074</guid>
      <dc:creator>npingl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum aggr size for 8.3 FAS8040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103808#M21076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;cdot - you need a system aggregate.. 3 disk raid-dp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check the HWU for max aggr size in cdot. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103808#M21076</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-27T14:04:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maximum aggr size for 8.3 FAS8040</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103814#M21078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You're well below the limit of 324TB, 30 shelves or 720 disks/LUNs. &amp;nbsp;You should end up with ~66TB usable on each node (after root aggregagtes, spares and parity disks) across 2 (16 disk) RAID groups in the data aggregate. &amp;nbsp;With VMware you'll want to be careful more with your Datastore sizes to make sure you can handle the backup/restore RPO/RTO than you will any technical limits. &amp;nbsp;We try to keep our Datastores ~3TB and use Datastore Clusters to ease placement and management, but it all depends on the process and technology you plan to utilize for your backup/DR capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Maximum-aggr-size-for-8-3-FAS8040/m-p/103814#M21078</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesIlderton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-04-27T17:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

