<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9415#M2136</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input guys,&amp;nbsp; I really appreciate the links and corrections.&amp;nbsp; I guess one of my concerns is that the onboard SAS ports reside on the same asic.&amp;nbsp; So if the asic fails a controller failover will be initiated where as with use of two four port cards I can layout the redundant drops such that the card is no longer a single point of failure. &lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;So I just re-read this statement and while true it can be mitigated by mixing the drops between a local 4 port SAS card and the onboard ports.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek, within the linked post bellow the one you mentioned expands upon my concern regarding mixing local and expansion FC cards.&amp;nbsp; Since the local ports are 4Gb/s and an expansion card would be 8Gb/s this would mean that I could not simply add the expansion card and use both the local and expansion card ports.&amp;nbsp; This would mean that my local 4Gb/s ports would be useless since I'm running in single image mode which includes all local target fc ports within the same group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please correct me if this functionality has changed. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chriszurich</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-15T14:14:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9394#M2123</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After recently receiving my new 3270 controller pair I had a few suprise's...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is an additional issue which I either missed when reviewing the documentation or is possibly not mentioned at all.&amp;nbsp; The issue I speak of is that with the new 10GbE interconnect (HA Active/Active) change there is &lt;STRONG&gt;no longer 4 onboard fibre channel ports &lt;/STRONG&gt;available per controller.&amp;nbsp; If you wish to cluster a pair on 3200's series arrays you will only have &lt;STRONG&gt;two 4GbS FC ports per controller pair&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp; While I understand that an FC card can easily be added to expansion ports this seems like a glaring issue for those of us who wish to use our new 3200 as a multi-purpose SAN/NAS box.&amp;nbsp; Plus this goes against existing best practices which state that FC target traffic should be isolated to either a single card or the local FC ports but not both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd also like to get feedback on how others are planning on using the two local SAS ports built into each controller.&amp;nbsp; With the cabling diagrams I've reviewed as well as the best practice documents I see no real use for them unless I wish to build out a non-redundant SAS stack.&amp;nbsp; In my environment this is not an option since uptime and performance is my main concern.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9394#M2123</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriszurich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9398#M2125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have my FAS3140 pair cabled via quad port SAS HBA in each filer via the A&amp;amp;C port on each card.&amp;nbsp; In the very unlikley event of a card failure the filer can route the traffic via the internal interconnect.&amp;nbsp; Not perfect but good enough while the problem card is replaced.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PS - Have you seen this yet?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/filer/215-05500_A0.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/hardware/filer/215-05500_A0.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9398#M2125</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-14T15:11:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9403#M2128</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two SAS ports per controller is enough to build redundant MP-HA stack with 240 disks. If you need more, you could add more SAS HBAs ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:09:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9403#M2128</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T08:09:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9411#M2133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;this seems like a glaring issue for those of us who wish to use our new 3200 as a multi-purpose SAN/NAS box.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;To me 2x 2 FC ports is just enough to provide resilient connectivity via two fabrics - each port from each controller goes to fabric A &amp;amp; B respectively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;this goes against existing best practices which state that FC target traffic should be isolated to either a single card or the local FC ports but not both.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is no longer the case with ONTAP 7.3.2 or higher:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/message/44248#44248" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/44248#44248&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:25:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9411#M2133</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T09:25:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9415#M2136</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the input guys,&amp;nbsp; I really appreciate the links and corrections.&amp;nbsp; I guess one of my concerns is that the onboard SAS ports reside on the same asic.&amp;nbsp; So if the asic fails a controller failover will be initiated where as with use of two four port cards I can layout the redundant drops such that the card is no longer a single point of failure. &lt;SPAN style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;So I just re-read this statement and while true it can be mitigated by mixing the drops between a local 4 port SAS card and the onboard ports.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek, within the linked post bellow the one you mentioned expands upon my concern regarding mixing local and expansion FC cards.&amp;nbsp; Since the local ports are 4Gb/s and an expansion card would be 8Gb/s this would mean that I could not simply add the expansion card and use both the local and expansion card ports.&amp;nbsp; This would mean that my local 4Gb/s ports would be useless since I'm running in single image mode which includes all local target fc ports within the same group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please correct me if this functionality has changed. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.0.8/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9415#M2136</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriszurich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T14:14:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9419#M2138</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Saw the cabling guide and read it a couple months back.&amp;nbsp; Now that I actually have the hardware I'll read through it again.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:16:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9419#M2138</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriszurich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T14:16:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9422#M2140</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;Since the local ports are 4Gb/s and an expansion card would be 8Gb/s this would mean that I could not simply add the expansion card and use both the local and expansion card ports.&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep - if you opt for 8GBit cards (which seems to be rather obvious choice these days).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In theory you can use 4Gbit HBAs (X1128A-R6 or X1130A-R6), so mixing all FC ports would be fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That said, I am not trying to blindly prove my point &amp;amp; actually I've been always surprised by the fact that 32x0 onboard ports are 4Gbit only (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/message/42960#42960" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/message/42960#42960&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; - you've seen this already as your post is in this thread as well)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9422#M2140</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-15T14:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9430#M2143</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same speed rule applies only to target ports. You can have initiator ports of different speed, or mix target and initiator ports of different speed. So if you add 8Gb/s target HBA, you can use on board for shelf connection just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9430#M2143</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-17T06:21:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3270 - Local SAS Ports Best Practices (Use Cases...)?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9434#M2145</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I see your point but would like to reiterate that the Fibre Channel ports on this filer will never be used as initiators (disk initiators to be exact).&amp;nbsp; All of the shelves I plan on attaching are of the SAS varient so my only use for FC ports is as &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;targets&lt;/SPAN&gt; for host I/O.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Soon I'll have the box fully cabled and will start my baseline performance testing.&amp;nbsp; We'll see how hard I can punish the two local 4Gb FC ports... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/3270-Local-SAS-Ports-Best-Practices-Use-Cases/m-p/9434#M2145</guid>
      <dc:creator>chriszurich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-17T22:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

