<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic High disk utilization on NetApp self-encrypting disks using snapmirror in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-disk-utilization-on-NetApp-self-encrypting-disks-using-snapmirror/m-p/105645#M21669</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does NetApp self-encrypting disks increases the background scanning process (such as disk deswizzling, block reclamation..etc) due to encryption compared to non-encrypting NetApp disks. We are experience high reads on the disks which has snapmirrored destination volumes due to deswizzling process. Both snapmirror source and destination storage has self-encrypting disks. &amp;nbsp;The CPU &amp;nbsp;usage is low (&amp;lt; 30%) and Memeory usage is also low. Due to business requirements, we have aggressive snapmirror schedule (every 15 minutes) and the updates between the schedule are low ( &amp;gt; 500MB).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But after every update, we see disk usage will shoot up to 100% and on stait output, we see the 300+ disk iops on 10k rpm drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question is does NetApp self-encrypting disks increases disk background scanning process due to encryption as it may not be updating few changed blocks after snapmirror update process, but entire blocks due to encryption.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ben_Rockwood</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:12:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High disk utilization on NetApp self-encrypting disks using snapmirror</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-disk-utilization-on-NetApp-self-encrypting-disks-using-snapmirror/m-p/105645#M21669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does NetApp self-encrypting disks increases the background scanning process (such as disk deswizzling, block reclamation..etc) due to encryption compared to non-encrypting NetApp disks. We are experience high reads on the disks which has snapmirrored destination volumes due to deswizzling process. Both snapmirror source and destination storage has self-encrypting disks. &amp;nbsp;The CPU &amp;nbsp;usage is low (&amp;lt; 30%) and Memeory usage is also low. Due to business requirements, we have aggressive snapmirror schedule (every 15 minutes) and the updates between the schedule are low ( &amp;gt; 500MB).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But after every update, we see disk usage will shoot up to 100% and on stait output, we see the 300+ disk iops on 10k rpm drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So my question is does NetApp self-encrypting disks increases disk background scanning process due to encryption as it may not be updating few changed blocks after snapmirror update process, but entire blocks due to encryption.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-disk-utilization-on-NetApp-self-encrypting-disks-using-snapmirror/m-p/105645#M21669</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ben_Rockwood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:12:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

