<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Network Default Failover Policy in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Network-Default-Failover-Policy/m-p/105802#M21707</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In most cases, it is better to create a specific failover group to ensure the interfaces that will be used as failover are appropriate (speed / vlans).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rwelshman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-03T19:20:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Network Default Failover Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Network-Default-Failover-Policy/m-p/105756#M21697</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a two node clustered Ontap installed, and when we try to create a logical interface a failover policy named "&lt;EM&gt;system-defined&lt;/EM&gt;" is automatically assigned to a LIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As per documentation, &lt;EM&gt;system-defined &lt;/EM&gt;failover policy is defined as&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Only those ports in the failover group that are on the LIF's home node and on a non-SFO partner node.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I interpreate it correct, it wont failover any interface that belongs to its HA partner node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will that be a good choice to&amp;nbsp;keep&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;system-defined &lt;/EM&gt;failover policy for any data LIF if we have a two Node Cluster mode system, and if not is there any reason why Netapp made is default/automatic as automatic assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help me understanding it correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;,Sheelnidhi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:11:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Network-Default-Failover-Policy/m-p/105756#M21697</guid>
      <dc:creator>sheelnidhig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:11:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network Default Failover Policy</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Network-Default-Failover-Policy/m-p/105802#M21707</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In most cases, it is better to create a specific failover group to ensure the interfaces that will be used as failover are appropriate (speed / vlans).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:20:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Network-Default-Failover-Policy/m-p/105802#M21707</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwelshman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-06-03T19:20:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

