<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Managing backups in cDOT using SnapVault in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Managing-backups-in-cDOT-using-SnapVault/m-p/106257#M21857</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are using Clustered ONTAP with two clusters.&amp;nbsp; I am SnapVaulting from one site to another.&amp;nbsp; I am replicating two volumes, both of which are VMWare datastore volumes.&amp;nbsp; I am using SMVI/VSC to backup a number of VMs and then SnapVaulting them to the secondary site.&amp;nbsp; I have set a local retention of 2 days and we have a requirement to retain 90 days worth of backups on the SnapVault site.&amp;nbsp; I also have a large number of SQL servers.&amp;nbsp; The databases are also required to be backed up.&amp;nbsp; I intend on using SMSQL.&amp;nbsp; Due to the number of SQL servers that I have (20+) and with the retention period of snapshots I will very quickly hit the 251 snapshot limit on the destination volume.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been told that a way around this would be to create a second SnapVault relationship from the original source volume(s) which would create a 'fan out' topology.&amp;nbsp; I would then need to set the first relationship to be updated by SMVI and the second relationship to be updated by SMSQL.&amp;nbsp; Herein lies the problem.&amp;nbsp; SMVI is aware of its relationship and when the backup jobs run they update the first SnapVault relationship.&amp;nbsp; When SMSQL runs and updates the SnapVault it sees both relationships and updates both relationships.&amp;nbsp; I now have SMSQL snapshots on the destination volume for my first relationship and SMSQL snapshots on the second volume.&amp;nbsp; All I need is to split the snapshot load so that the first destination volume only holds SMVI snapshots and the second destination only holds SMSQL snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have added this to the end of this conversation thread since I believe that I may have to consider using PostScripting in order to SnapVault the particular relationship.&amp;nbsp; Any ideas how I could achieve this??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JustinM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:09:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Managing backups in cDOT using SnapVault</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Managing-backups-in-cDOT-using-SnapVault/m-p/106257#M21857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are using Clustered ONTAP with two clusters.&amp;nbsp; I am SnapVaulting from one site to another.&amp;nbsp; I am replicating two volumes, both of which are VMWare datastore volumes.&amp;nbsp; I am using SMVI/VSC to backup a number of VMs and then SnapVaulting them to the secondary site.&amp;nbsp; I have set a local retention of 2 days and we have a requirement to retain 90 days worth of backups on the SnapVault site.&amp;nbsp; I also have a large number of SQL servers.&amp;nbsp; The databases are also required to be backed up.&amp;nbsp; I intend on using SMSQL.&amp;nbsp; Due to the number of SQL servers that I have (20+) and with the retention period of snapshots I will very quickly hit the 251 snapshot limit on the destination volume.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been told that a way around this would be to create a second SnapVault relationship from the original source volume(s) which would create a 'fan out' topology.&amp;nbsp; I would then need to set the first relationship to be updated by SMVI and the second relationship to be updated by SMSQL.&amp;nbsp; Herein lies the problem.&amp;nbsp; SMVI is aware of its relationship and when the backup jobs run they update the first SnapVault relationship.&amp;nbsp; When SMSQL runs and updates the SnapVault it sees both relationships and updates both relationships.&amp;nbsp; I now have SMSQL snapshots on the destination volume for my first relationship and SMSQL snapshots on the second volume.&amp;nbsp; All I need is to split the snapshot load so that the first destination volume only holds SMVI snapshots and the second destination only holds SMSQL snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have added this to the end of this conversation thread since I believe that I may have to consider using PostScripting in order to SnapVault the particular relationship.&amp;nbsp; Any ideas how I could achieve this??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 04:09:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Managing-backups-in-cDOT-using-SnapVault/m-p/106257#M21857</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustinM</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T04:09:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

