<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: metrocluster pool0 and pool1 on one shelf in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/metrocluster-pool0-and-pool1-on-one-shelf/m-p/109234#M23083</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, having node 1 pool0 and node 2 pool1 disks in one stack (and thus&amp;nbsp;in one shelf) is supported. It is not recommended as per TR-3548 (search for "mixed disk pool configurations") but it's supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might&amp;nbsp;need to manually assign any replaced disks though, since the controllers can't always figure out by themselves which controller should get any new disks assigned (especially if you have &amp;gt;1 spare per node)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-31T12:54:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>metrocluster pool0 and pool1 on one shelf</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/metrocluster-pool0-and-pool1-on-one-shelf/m-p/109090#M23051</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to have on one shelf local pool0 and remote pool1?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Till now I have a symmetrical full-mirrored fabric-attached metrocluster. Now the customer came with a great idea to use unmirrored aggregate. I would recommend to work on shelf basis - mirror the whole shelf to another shelf on the other site and use the whole shelf for unmirrored aggregate(I have 4 shelves per site). But they need different amount of space for unmirrored aggregate so it leads to the situation where pool0-local has to coexist with pool1-remote on one shelf. Is it supported/recommended... what trouble it can bring.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP 8.2.2P1 7-mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS8060&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DS2246 with ATTO bridges&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 23:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/metrocluster-pool0-and-pool1-on-one-shelf/m-p/109090#M23051</guid>
      <dc:creator>maskajan09</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T23:26:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: metrocluster pool0 and pool1 on one shelf</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/metrocluster-pool0-and-pool1-on-one-shelf/m-p/109234#M23083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, having node 1 pool0 and node 2 pool1 disks in one stack (and thus&amp;nbsp;in one shelf) is supported. It is not recommended as per TR-3548 (search for "mixed disk pool configurations") but it's supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might&amp;nbsp;need to manually assign any replaced disks though, since the controllers can't always figure out by themselves which controller should get any new disks assigned (especially if you have &amp;gt;1 spare per node)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Michael&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/metrocluster-pool0-and-pool1-on-one-shelf/m-p/109234#M23083</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darkstar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-31T12:54:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

