<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118032#M25207</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer the image attached. Reference &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1636036" target="_self"&gt;SAN Configuration Guide&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;Multifabric HA configurations on page 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 02:59:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-07T02:59:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118016#M25203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;2 8060 filers with 4 FC ports on each node. what the connections to 2 SAN switches should look like? pls see the attached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 ports on each filer to 2 different switches should be good enough? then there will be 2 empty ports left on each filer, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your help!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 21:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118016#M25203</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T21:31:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118032#M25207</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer the image attached. Reference &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1636036" target="_self"&gt;SAN Configuration Guide&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;Multifabric HA configurations on page 24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 02:59:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118032#M25207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-07T02:59:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118046#M25211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-quilt-column lia-quilt-column-22 lia-quilt-column-right lia-quilt-column-main-right"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-quilt-column-alley lia-quilt-column-alley-right"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-NetApp-Employee"&gt;Hi &lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/28401" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="login-bold"&gt;Sahana&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, Thank you!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-NetApp-Employee"&gt;Could you please help me to explain what is the difference on the diagram I drew and the one you provided in which all 4 FC ports on the node will be used? What issues would it caused by using my diagram?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-user-name"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-NetApp-Employee"&gt;Looking forward to hear you again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118046#M25211</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-07T10:51:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118047#M25212</link>
      <description>In the recommended configuration, there are 2 connections from each controller to each switch. So it utilizes all 4 ports=2 connection x2 switches on a single controller. So you will have redundant connection to the switch also.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 12:14:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118047#M25212</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-07T12:14:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118050#M25213</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I noticed that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my diagram, if the connection to the switch got failed, the data could be alternated to the other fabric (switch), correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If yes, why would I need to have two connetions from the same node to the same switch? where would the single point failure be in my diagram? Or what is the disadvantage is with it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118050#M25213</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-07T21:22:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118081#M25221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can somebody please help to answer my previous questions. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118081#M25221</guid>
      <dc:creator>heightsnj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-08T11:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 4 onboard FC ports to 2 SAN Switches</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118134#M25226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your design does not have single point of failure. However with 2 connections to the same switch has higher redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 08:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/4-onboard-FC-ports-to-2-SAN-Switches/m-p/118134#M25226</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-11T08:48:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

