<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why 8.3.x has betther performance than 9.0? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Why-8-3-x-has-betther-performance-than-9-0/m-p/122481#M26287</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I simulated by spm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same Model FAS8040A, same workload - 80% random read 20% random write, same protocol and same disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Ontap 9.0 has poor performance Maximum IOPS and throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I only changed version of Ontap!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below pictures are&amp;nbsp;performance results at&amp;nbsp;simulated by netapp SPM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Left image is Ontap9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="11111.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5796iF544481B416B6320/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="11111.png" alt="11111.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 19:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KHYOON123</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T19:26:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why 8.3.x has betther performance than 9.0?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Why-8-3-x-has-betther-performance-than-9-0/m-p/122481#M26287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I simulated by spm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same Model FAS8040A, same workload - 80% random read 20% random write, same protocol and same disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But Ontap 9.0 has poor performance Maximum IOPS and throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I only changed version of Ontap!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below pictures are&amp;nbsp;performance results at&amp;nbsp;simulated by netapp SPM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Left image is Ontap9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="11111.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5796iF544481B416B6320/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="11111.png" alt="11111.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 19:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Why-8-3-x-has-betther-performance-than-9-0/m-p/122481#M26287</guid>
      <dc:creator>KHYOON123</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T19:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

