<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Cannot form 3-site cluster peering for cdot 8.3 with cross-site links on different subnets in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/122752#M26329</link>
    <description>Thank you!!</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NATHANKIPPEN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-30T19:30:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cannot form 3-site cluster peering for cdot 8.3 with cross-site links on different subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/113353#M24037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of migrating from 7-mode to cdot 8.3 with FAS filers installed in 3 sites.&amp;nbsp; We need to run snapmirror between A-B site and B-C site.&amp;nbsp; There are dedicated cross site links between A-B site and B-C site for replication, they are on different subnets and are not routable due to physical limitation.&amp;nbsp; With 7-mode snapmirror ran fine as we could just setup snapmirror to use the specific IP for replication.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However we are having difficulties setting up cluster peering in 8.3 cdot.&amp;nbsp; In B site, we first set up one set of LIFs for replication to A site, and formed peer cluster with A site successfully.&amp;nbsp; We then set up the LIFs for replication to C site, and tried to form cluster peer with C site.&amp;nbsp; On C site it could complete the cluster peer create command, but on B site it failed with below error:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;b-ntap01::cluster peer&amp;gt; create -peer-addrs 10.0.9.156,10.0.9.157&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Notice: Choose a passphraseof 8 or more characters. To ensure the authenticity of the peering relationship, use a phrase or sequence of characters that would be hard&lt;BR /&gt;to guess.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Enter the passphrase:&lt;BR /&gt;Confirm the passphrase:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Error: command failed: An introductory RPC to the peer address "10.0.9.156" failed to connect: RPC: Remote system error - No route to host. Verify that the peer address is correct and try again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;network interface show output is as follows:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;b-ntap01::&amp;gt; network interface show -role intercluster&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Logical Status Network Current Current Is&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Vserver Interface Admin/Oper Address/Mask Node Port Home&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;----------- ---------- ---------- ------------------ ------------- ------- ----&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01a-repa&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;up/up 10.0.8.184/25 b-ntap01-01 a0c true&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01a-repc&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;up/up 10.0.9.26/25 b-ntap01-01 a0f true&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01b-repa&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;up/up 10.0.8.185/25 b-ntap01-02 a0c true&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01b-repc&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;up/up 10.0.9.27/25 b-ntap01-02 a0f true&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4 entries were displayed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have verified that B site can ping A site and C site successfully.&amp;nbsp; We have also verified that if we delete the LIFs for replication to A site and only set up those for C site, we can successfully form a cluster peer between B site and C site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cluster peer ping result is as follows.&amp;nbsp; It seems that it couldn't even ping its own LIF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;b-ntap01::&amp;gt; cluster peer ping&lt;BR /&gt;Node: b-ntap01-01 Destination Cluster: a-ntap01&lt;BR /&gt;Destination Node IP Address Count TTL RTT(ms) Status&lt;BR /&gt;---------------- ---------------- ----- ---- ------- -------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;a-ntap01-01 10.0.8.54 1 253 0.915 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;a-ntap01-02 10.0.8.55 1 253 0.922 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;Node: b-ntap01-01 Destination Cluster: b-ntap01&lt;BR /&gt;Destination Node IP Address Count TTL RTT(ms) Status&lt;BR /&gt;---------------- ---------------- ----- ---- ------- -------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-01 10.0.8.184 1 255 0.128 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-01 10.0.9.26 1 - - unreachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-02 10.0.8.185 1 255 0.457 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-02 10.0.9.27 1 - - unreachable&lt;BR /&gt;Node: b-ntap01-02 Destination Cluster: a-ntap01&lt;BR /&gt;Destination Node IP Address Count TTL RTT(ms) Status&lt;BR /&gt;---------------- ---------------- ----- ---- ------- -------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;a-ntap01-01 10.0.8.54 1 253 0.688 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;a-ntap01-02 10.0.8.55 1 253 0.676 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;Node: b-ntap01-02 Destination Cluster: b-ntap01&lt;BR /&gt;Destination Node IP Address Count TTL RTT(ms) Status&lt;BR /&gt;---------------- ---------------- ----- ---- ------- -------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-01 10.0.8.184 1 255 0.2 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-01 10.0.9.26 1 - - unreachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-02 10.0.8.185 1 255 0.092 interface_reachable&lt;BR /&gt;b-ntap01-02 10.0.9.27 1 - - unreachable&lt;BR /&gt;12 entries were displayed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="x23i x28t x240"&gt;So is it possible to form the cluster peer relationship between B and C site in our case?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 22:35:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/113353#M24037</guid>
      <dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T22:35:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot form 3-site cluster peering for cdot 8.3 with cross-site links on different subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/113385#M24054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have solved it by upgrading to 8.3.1, which allows cluster peering by IPspace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe NetApp should update its own Clustered&lt;SPAN class="st"&gt; Data ONTAP 8.3(.1) Cluster Peering Express Guide?&amp;nbsp; Even the 8.3.1 Express Gulde documentations point to the 8.3 version of cluster peering guide, which has no mention of cluster peering by IPspace.&amp;nbsp; I just stumbled upon it by chance when searching for 8.3.1 cluster peering on Google, after NetApp support told me all intercluster LIFs must reside in the same subnet in 8.3.&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2015 08:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/113385#M24054</guid>
      <dc:creator>sil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-07T08:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cannot form 3-site cluster peering for cdot 8.3 with cross-site links on different subnets</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/122752#M26329</link>
      <description>Thank you!!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 19:30:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cannot-form-3-site-cluster-peering-for-cdot-8-3-with-cross-site-links-on/m-p/122752#M26329</guid>
      <dc:creator>NATHANKIPPEN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-30T19:30:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

