<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VIF creation on static interface in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/VIF-creation-on-static-interface/m-p/123585#M26484</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;HI ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new in netapp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create vlan on my storage .I have only two interface available .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS2020&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Release 7.3.7P3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e0a: flags=0x2d48867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 150.236.127.122 netmask-or-prefix 0xffffffe0 broadcast 150.236.127.127&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; partner inet 150.236.127.117 (not in use)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:a0:98:11:db:1c (auto-100tx-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e0b: flags=0x2d48867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 150.236.127.203 netmask-or-prefix 0xffffffe0 broadcast 150.236.127.223&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; partner inet 150.236.127.202 (not in use)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:a0:98:11:db:1d (auto-1000t-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;lo: flags=0x1948049&amp;lt;UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 8160&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 127.0.0.1 netmask-or-prefix 0xff000000 broadcast 127.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (VIA Provider)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create vif on one (e0b interface) or i need to use both e0a and e0b. How to create vif on running interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e0a is a 100mpbs interface and e0b is 1000mpbs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>f0rest</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:54:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VIF creation on static interface</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/VIF-creation-on-static-interface/m-p/123585#M26484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am new in netapp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to create vlan on my storage .I have only two interface available .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FAS2020&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp Release 7.3.7P3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e0a: flags=0x2d48867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 150.236.127.122 netmask-or-prefix 0xffffffe0 broadcast 150.236.127.127&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; partner inet 150.236.127.117 (not in use)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:a0:98:11:db:1c (auto-100tx-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e0b: flags=0x2d48867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 150.236.127.203 netmask-or-prefix 0xffffffe0 broadcast 150.236.127.223&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; partner inet 150.236.127.202 (not in use)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:a0:98:11:db:1d (auto-1000t-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;lo: flags=0x1948049&amp;lt;UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 8160&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; inet 127.0.0.1 netmask-or-prefix 0xff000000 broadcast 127.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (VIA Provider)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to create vif on one (e0b interface) or i need to use both e0a and e0b. How to create vif on running interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e0a is a 100mpbs interface and e0b is 1000mpbs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:54:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/VIF-creation-on-static-interface/m-p/123585#M26484</guid>
      <dc:creator>f0rest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:54:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VIF creation on static interface</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/VIF-creation-on-static-interface/m-p/123589#M26486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi f0rest -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While technically possible to crete a VIF with just one interface, the obvious question is why? &amp;nbsp;You mentioned you are new to NetApp - here's a very generic&amp;nbsp;overview of NetApp VIFs. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A VIF (literally Virtual InterFace, aka interface group or ifgrp) is a logical network port built on top of physical network port(s) or other VIFs. &amp;nbsp;VIFs allow creation of amplified capability - port failover, increased total bandwidth at a single logical endpoint, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VIFs take one of two distinct modes - "single mode" where only one member of the VIF is active, and "multi-mode" where multiple physical ports in the VIF are simultaneously active. &amp;nbsp;Single mode VIFs provide failover between a group of ports. &amp;nbsp;One port and only one is active, the others are "passive". &amp;nbsp;If the active port stops working for any reason, communication can switch to one of the passive ports. &amp;nbsp;The assumption is that the passive ports are configured to allow communication in the same network configuration as was the formerly active port.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Multi-mode VIFs will send data over all member ports at the same time. &amp;nbsp;There are two variations of these as well - a basic multi-mode which is essentially port bonding and an advanced controllable mode using LACP as a control protocol. &amp;nbsp;Which multi-mode option you might be able to use depends on what your switch supports. &amp;nbsp;A basic switch might support simple port-bonding only, whereas higher end switches might be able to distribute the various members of an LACP type mult-mode VIF across physical switches.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two or more multi-mode VIFs can be members of a higher level single mode VIF. &amp;nbsp;That way you have a single logical endpoint that can flip between groups of physical connections to switches. &amp;nbsp;It can be as complex or as simple as you like.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So back to your question. &amp;nbsp;In your configuration you note port e0a and e0b are running at different speeds. &amp;nbsp;I'm going to guess they are connected to different switches as well, athough they could be to the same switch at different speeds of course. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To your question - yes you can create a single-mode VIF or at least a basic multi-mode VIF and assign it e0b as a single member. &amp;nbsp;If you never associated another port to the VIF, you gain nothing over using it as port e0b directly. &amp;nbsp;Which leads back to "why"? &amp;nbsp;If your intent is to use both ports e0a and e0b for a failover singlemode VIF, that begs the question of the entire network design given they currently run at different speeds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have time to respond it would be helpful to know what you want to accomplish and why you are considering a VIF in this configuration.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bob Greenwald&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senior Systems Engineer | &lt;A title="cStor:  We go Beyond IT" href="http://www.cstor.com" target="_blank"&gt;cStor&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NCIE SAN ONTAP, Data Protection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="1 2 3 4 5 6 7"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Kudos and accepted solutions are always appreciated.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 19:51:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/VIF-creation-on-static-interface/m-p/123589#M26486</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobshouseofcards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-26T19:51:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

