<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Nic bonding in Netapp in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124864#M26877</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two 10G&amp;nbsp;ports and I need to configure as NIC bond like in linux.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each port is connected to two different switches (Two different hardware vendor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both&amp;nbsp;ports has to communicate with single IP and should load balance the traffic like round robin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS: ontap 8.1.4 7 mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help for this setup and also let me is any configuration is needed in switching side&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SagarDH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:28:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124864#M26877</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have two 10G&amp;nbsp;ports and I need to configure as NIC bond like in linux.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each port is connected to two different switches (Two different hardware vendor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both&amp;nbsp;ports has to communicate with single IP and should load balance the traffic like round robin.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OS: ontap 8.1.4 7 mode&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help for this setup and also let me is any configuration is needed in switching side&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:28:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124864#M26877</guid>
      <dc:creator>SagarDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:28:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124869#M26881</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can configure ifgroup on those two ports and you can use both the physical ports with single ip address.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But in this case you ports are connected to different switchs, so you need to configure vPC on switch side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if switchports are configured in vPC (virtual port channel)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It’s not that simple. Switches must be configured in vPC cluster, you need extra ISL connections as well as additional heartbit one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’m not networking specialist so I guess you better discuss it with your network guys. If anything, using vPC mean spending 4 to 6 additional ports only to interconnect switches together.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:06:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124869#M26881</guid>
      <dc:creator>Naveenpusuluru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-28T13:06:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124889#M26888</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well........&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What you want to do is 802.3ad / 802.1AZ link aggregation...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the NetApp side it's IFGRPs: ifgrp create [ single | multi | lacp ] ifgrp_name [ -b {rr|mac|ip|port} ] [ interface_list ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, what you &lt;STRONG&gt;want&lt;/STRONG&gt; is load-balancing, round-robin: ifgrp create &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;lacp&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&amp;nbsp;My20gIfGrp&amp;nbsp; &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-b rr&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; e1a e2a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BUT, the switch(es) have to support that and be configured also!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You didn't mention, which switches you use, but you did mention &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;different HW vendors.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's tricky enough to do this with a single switch vendor, &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;it's impossible with different switch vendors!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just to mention:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Cisco Nexus and a &lt;U&gt;single&lt;/U&gt; switch, it would be configuring a "&lt;U&gt;port channel (PC)"&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Cisco Nexus and &lt;U&gt;two compatible (probably same) switches&lt;/U&gt;, it would be configuring a "&lt;U&gt;virtual &lt;/U&gt;&lt;U&gt;port channel (vPC)"&lt;/U&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I could tell you, how to configure a vPC, but since you didn't mention Cisco Nexus, and DID mention 2 different vendors, it would be pointless.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;What you CAN do:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No load-balancing, just failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;single&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&amp;nbsp;My10gIfGrp&amp;nbsp; e1a e2a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, there's &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;no switch configuration&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; necessary, apart from the usual port speed and stuff.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry to disappoint you, but hope that helps (maybe you find 2 switches from the same vendor...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/124889#M26888</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sebastian_Goetze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-29T09:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125002#M26923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Sebastian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My switches wont support portchannel so now i will opt for failover. I am trying below command and i am getting error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ifgrp create single grp10g c0a c0b&lt;BR /&gt;vif: Error: not allowed for a private interface&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 04:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125002#M26923</guid>
      <dc:creator>SagarDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T04:25:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125004#M26924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please, display output of 'ifconfig -a' command&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125004#M26924</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaemonFF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T05:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125005#M26925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the ifconfig -a&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e0a: flags=0x270c866&amp;lt;BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:88 (auto-unknown-down) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e0b: flags=0x2f4c867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 10.10.10.100 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.193.180.255&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:89 (auto-1000t-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e1a: flags=0x1f0c866&amp;lt;BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM,LRO&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 90:e2:ba:36:5b:8c (auto-10g_sr-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e1b: flags=0x1f0c866&amp;lt;BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM,LRO&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 90:e2:ba:36:5b:8d (auto-10g_sr-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;c0a: flags=0x174e867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 9000 PRIVATE&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 192.168.1.7 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:8a (auto-10g_twinax-fd-down) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;c0b: flags=0x174e867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 9000 PRIVATE&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 192.168.2.48 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:8b (auto-10g_twinax-fd-down) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e0M: flags=0x230c866&amp;lt;BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM,MGMT_PORT&amp;gt; mtu 1500&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:8c (auto-unknown-down) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;e0P: flags=0x2b4c867&amp;lt;UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM,ACP_PORT&amp;gt; mtu 1500 PRIVATE&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 192.168.0.108 netmask 0xfffffc00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 noddns&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:a0:98:3f:b3:8d (auto-100tx-fd-up) flowcontrol full&lt;BR /&gt;lo: flags=0x1b48049&amp;lt;UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,TCPCKSUM&amp;gt; mtu 8160&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 (RNIC Provider)&lt;BR /&gt;losk: flags=0x40a400c9&amp;lt;UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING&amp;gt; mtu 9188&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;inet 127.0.20.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 127.0.20.1&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:36:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125005#M26925</guid>
      <dc:creator>SagarDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T05:36:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125006#M26926</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your system has used interfaces c0a and c0b for ACP connection. You cannot use with LACP or other port channel capabilities.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125006#M26926</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaemonFF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T05:54:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125007#M26927</link>
      <description>That's correct - c0a and c0b are used for HA Pair interconnect; they cannot be used for anything else.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 05:54:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125007#M26927</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T05:54:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125010#M26929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your replies but c0a and c0b is not connected I thought these links are 10G for switching connectivity and any way i have opted another slot for failover.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125010#M26929</guid>
      <dc:creator>SagarDH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T06:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nic bonding in Netapp</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125013#M26932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Only ports marked &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;e&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;.., like e0b, e1a (extension card in first slot), and so on can be used for Ethernet connections!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The c.. ports speak iWarp (Infiniband over Ethernet), which you can see when you watch your 3200 system boot (only in your case it seems to use the backplane instead, because you seem to have 2 controllers in 1 chassis)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hopefully you have other ports you can use... (starting with an "e"!, Not marked "PRIVATE"- like e0P and the c.. ports), like e1a and e1b...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sebastian&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 07:34:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Nic-bonding-in-Netapp/m-p/125013#M26932</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sebastian_Goetze</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-02T07:34:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

