<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: volume distribution along the agregate / Raid Groups in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125967#M27160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll check this and see what I find.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ThomasC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-05T15:30:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>volume distribution along the agregate / Raid Groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125963#M27158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I run a FAS3220 cluster, running the 8.2.1 version, 7 mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one aggregate aggr0. This aggregate contains around 10 volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other side, this aggregate is composed of 2 raid groups, of each 23 disks, in raid DP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here is the issue I have...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;some users encounter lag &amp;amp; performance issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I checked disk activity, I saw that the disks of the 1st raid group are almost allways over busy, with IOPS almost at the limit for that kind of disk,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and on the other side, the disks of the 2nd raid group, are almost unused! (around 10 - 15IOPS average...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I guess that there is an issue with the volumes distribution along the aggregate and the Raid groups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I identified the 3 volumes the more "IOPS-greedy"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to better distribute these 3 volumes along the 2 Raid groups? Would a volume reallocate make that? Or is there maybe an other way to do that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot for your help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:07:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125963#M27158</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:07:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: volume distribution along the agregate / Raid Groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125966#M27159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems that when the second rg was added, there was no reallocate done so the data can be spread across the &amp;nbsp;new spindles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For 7-mode, look into the Re-allocation commands. &amp;nbsp;Google for this TR -&amp;nbsp;reallocate best practices tr-3929&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125966#M27159</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-05T15:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: volume distribution along the agregate / Raid Groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125967#M27160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll check this and see what I find.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 15:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/volume-distribution-along-the-agregate-Raid-Groups/m-p/125967#M27160</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-05T15:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

