<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ONTAP Select 9.x best practice for aggregate creation in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-9-x-best-practice-for-aggregate-creation/m-p/128280#M27797</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;From ONTAP Select document and TR-4517, I have following understanding:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;General guidance of&amp;nbsp;single–RAID group/single-LUN from underlying server DAS&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;LUN size limit by hypervisor extent limitation (64TB)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create multiple equal-sized LUNs if limit reached, then provision the vSphere datastore using all attached LUNs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ONTAP Select receives no performance benefits by increasing the number of LUNs within the RAID group. Adding additional LUNs should only be done to bypass hypervisor file system limitations.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;After ONTAP select VM is deployed&amp;nbsp;and root disks provisioned, the underlying attached storage is breaks up the into &lt;STRONG&gt;even number set of&amp;nbsp;equal-sized virtual disks&lt;/STRONG&gt;, each &lt;STRONG&gt;not exceeding 8TB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Similar to creating multiple LUNs, ONTAP Select receives no performance benefits by increasing the number of virtual disks used by the system.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When the second RAID group is added (server DAS), a second LUN must be provisioned and should be added as a new extent to the existing datastore.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;NetApp recommends that newly attached storage be added to the existing datastore as a new extent, rather than configured as a second datastore on the system.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the newly assigned storage should be split into an &lt;STRONG&gt;even number set &lt;/STRONG&gt;of &lt;STRONG&gt;equal-sized&lt;/STRONG&gt; virtual disks, &lt;STRONG&gt;not exceeding &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;8TB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Currently, the ONTAP Deploy tool does not support the workflow of adding space to a Select node, so this process must be done using the native vSphere tooling. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For four node ONTAP select cluster, all aggregate is RAID 0 and must be mirrored.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;maximum aggregate size is 100TiB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;maximun volume size is 60TiB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My question are:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can I create aggreate with more than 2 disks (X = even mumber)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;this means&amp;nbsp;X/2 number of raidgroup in each plex? (one raidgroup per disk)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Will there be any performance penalty?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If I increased the underlying datastore size and created more virtual disk, can I add the disks to the existing aggregate?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;what are the consideration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jiayih</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:25:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ONTAP Select 9.x best practice for aggregate creation</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-9-x-best-practice-for-aggregate-creation/m-p/128280#M27797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From ONTAP Select document and TR-4517, I have following understanding:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;General guidance of&amp;nbsp;single–RAID group/single-LUN from underlying server DAS&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;LUN size limit by hypervisor extent limitation (64TB)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Create multiple equal-sized LUNs if limit reached, then provision the vSphere datastore using all attached LUNs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ONTAP Select receives no performance benefits by increasing the number of LUNs within the RAID group. Adding additional LUNs should only be done to bypass hypervisor file system limitations.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;After ONTAP select VM is deployed&amp;nbsp;and root disks provisioned, the underlying attached storage is breaks up the into &lt;STRONG&gt;even number set of&amp;nbsp;equal-sized virtual disks&lt;/STRONG&gt;, each &lt;STRONG&gt;not exceeding 8TB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Similar to creating multiple LUNs, ONTAP Select receives no performance benefits by increasing the number of virtual disks used by the system.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When the second RAID group is added (server DAS), a second LUN must be provisioned and should be added as a new extent to the existing datastore.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;NetApp recommends that newly attached storage be added to the existing datastore as a new extent, rather than configured as a second datastore on the system.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the newly assigned storage should be split into an &lt;STRONG&gt;even number set &lt;/STRONG&gt;of &lt;STRONG&gt;equal-sized&lt;/STRONG&gt; virtual disks, &lt;STRONG&gt;not exceeding &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;8TB&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Currently, the ONTAP Deploy tool does not support the workflow of adding space to a Select node, so this process must be done using the native vSphere tooling. &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;For four node ONTAP select cluster, all aggregate is RAID 0 and must be mirrored.&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;maximum aggregate size is 100TiB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;maximun volume size is 60TiB&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My question are:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Can I create aggreate with more than 2 disks (X = even mumber)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;this means&amp;nbsp;X/2 number of raidgroup in each plex? (one raidgroup per disk)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Will there be any performance penalty?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If I increased the underlying datastore size and created more virtual disk, can I add the disks to the existing aggregate?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;what are the consideration?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ONTAP-Select-9-x-best-practice-for-aggregate-creation/m-p/128280#M27797</guid>
      <dc:creator>jiayih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

