<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Deduplication and Storage vMotion in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-and-Storage-vMotion/m-p/127331#M27819</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of migrating VMs from our current FAS to a new FAS. Current is running OnTap 8.3.2 and new&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;OnTap 9.1 and volumes are mounted NFSv3.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After migrating a fair number of VMs and enabling efficiency on the new volume, the effiiciency job completed. Hours later and it's still showing 0% savings for the volume.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there any way that the deduplication of the VMs could be preserved when performing an svmotion between two separate clusters like this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bsnyder27</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:31:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deduplication and Storage vMotion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-and-Storage-vMotion/m-p/127331#M27819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of migrating VMs from our current FAS to a new FAS. Current is running OnTap 8.3.2 and new&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;OnTap 9.1 and volumes are mounted NFSv3.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After migrating a fair number of VMs and enabling efficiency on the new volume, the effiiciency job completed. Hours later and it's still showing 0% savings for the volume.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there any way that the deduplication of the VMs could be preserved when performing an svmotion between two separate clusters like this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-and-Storage-vMotion/m-p/127331#M27819</guid>
      <dc:creator>bsnyder27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:31:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication and Storage vMotion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-and-Storage-vMotion/m-p/128045#M27820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11788"&gt;@bsnyder27&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately not without using storage array level replication, like SnapMirror, to move the entire datastore followed by performing a cutover...which is a disruptive operation (the VMs would need to be shutdown, removed from inventory at the old location, then re-added from the new).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you enable (post-process) deduplication after the data was added to the volume? &amp;nbsp;If so you'll need to do&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;volume efficiency start -vserver &amp;lt;vserver_name&amp;gt; -volume &amp;lt;volume_name&amp;gt; -scan-all&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andrew&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 17:33:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-and-Storage-vMotion/m-p/128045#M27820</guid>
      <dc:creator>asulliva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-13T17:33:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

