<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130493#M28395</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The FAS255x onboard ports support either NetApp or Cisco branded DAC/TwinAx cables, or NetApp's X6589 10Gb Optics..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However.. what you propose&amp;nbsp;is not supported, and generally will not work, except for a single controller system, or if you are only using it with iSCSI - with HA, to use ethernet, you must have a switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason is that when the system fails over, the IP will move to the other controller.. meaning you'd need a second interface on your server with the same IP address space, and Windows/Linux is unlikely to like that. There may be ways to get it work.. but it would be flaky.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-26T03:34:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130492#M28394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have currently a&amp;nbsp;FAS2554 storage with 4 port UTA. 2 Port is already configure with FC and another 2 free for CNA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current Current Pending Pending Admin&lt;BR /&gt;Adapter Mode Type Mode Type Status&lt;BR /&gt;------- ------- --------- ------- --------- -------&lt;BR /&gt;0c fc target - - online&lt;BR /&gt;0d fc target - - online&lt;BR /&gt;0e cna target - - online&lt;BR /&gt;0f cna target - - online&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are thinking of improving the LAN speed by performing the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Purchase a new 10GbE card and install on the Dell Server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Purchase direct attached cable - Active/Passive Optical ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Configure the local network with IP address between&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;FAS2554 and Dell Server for TCP/IP communication.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Note: We dont have the budget to purchase 10Gbe switches.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Questions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1) Will the above plan work?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2) For the direct attached cable, do we need the copper twinax type or we can use the normal LC-LC cable ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:09:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130492#M28394</guid>
      <dc:creator>penangmis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:09:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130493#M28395</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The FAS255x onboard ports support either NetApp or Cisco branded DAC/TwinAx cables, or NetApp's X6589 10Gb Optics..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However.. what you propose&amp;nbsp;is not supported, and generally will not work, except for a single controller system, or if you are only using it with iSCSI - with HA, to use ethernet, you must have a switch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason is that when the system fails over, the IP will move to the other controller.. meaning you'd need a second interface on your server with the same IP address space, and Windows/Linux is unlikely to like that. There may be ways to get it work.. but it would be flaky.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 03:34:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130493#M28395</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T03:34:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130495#M28396</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This FAS2554 have only single controller and it is vault for backup purpose. Generally it is not use for production usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if we get the N&lt;SPAN&gt;etApp or Cisco branded DAC/TwinAx cables connected, it will work right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We just want to backup NDMP over this 10Gb network - simple direct connection from NetApp to the Dell Server.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So far getting a switch is out of question, budget constraint.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130495#M28396</guid>
      <dc:creator>penangmis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T05:47:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130496#M28397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; So if we get the N&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;etApp or Cisco branded DAC/TwinAx cables connected, it will work right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;At an ethernet level, yes it will work. In terms of functionality, if all you are doing is NDMP, and it's a single controller, and you have a seperate IP range setup for just that link, it will very likely&amp;nbsp;work, but it is not a tested or supported configuration, so may require some trial and error.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:56:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130496#M28397</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-26T05:56:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130562#M28419</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are wondering just for a small environment for vault backup usage only, is the following entry switch supported to talk with FAS2554 ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;CISCO SG550XG-24F&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(&lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/550x-series-stackable-managed-switches/compare-model.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/switches/550x-series-stackable-managed-switches/compare-model.html&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are not able to get CISCO 4500X, as it is out of the range.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 03:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130562#M28419</guid>
      <dc:creator>penangmis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-27T03:47:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130642#M28428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We only provide blessing of specific switches as part of our Cisco "Flexpod" solution, which this would not be, so I can't say this switch is specifically supported, however it does meet all the requirements for connecting the NetApp system - SFP+ ports that will take a Cisco TwinAx cable. For general utility, I might look at the 8x10GBaseT + 8xSFP+ model instead, but functionality would be the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the Dell side of things, the shorter (&amp;lt;7M) cisco twinax cables are passive - some cards will only support "active" cables and some only support "passive", while some support both - The Intel X520 cards are an example of one that does both, but there are others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If budget is an issue, in your position, I would try the direct attach method - it should work - but it needs to be on the understanding that a switch may be needed later.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:43:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130642#M28428</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-28T15:43:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130672#M28435</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for the information. We are still awaiting for official NetApp engineer reply on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typically our switch vendor mentioned that it will work without issue for normal network communication on layer 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will update once I get the more information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 01:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130672#M28435</guid>
      <dc:creator>penangmis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-02T01:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS2554 direct attached SFP+ to Dell Server</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130729#M28443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Below is the reply from NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;Customers are welcomed to use any switch for ethernet connectivity. Netapp doesn’t certify ethernet switches.
I checked Cisco's web site and SG550XG-24F appears to be a pretty standard switch. &lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 05:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS2554-direct-attached-SFP-to-Dell-Server/m-p/130729#M28443</guid>
      <dc:creator>penangmis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T05:32:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

