<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: LIF Failover conditions in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130774#M28460</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this is what you looking for&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1196907/html/GUID-6DBD40F8-EA21-42AE-82CF-AEB556BEC783.html" target="_self"&gt;Scenarios that cause a LIF failover&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 19:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robinpeter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-03T19:56:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LIF Failover conditions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130766#M28455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to confirm the conditions that will initiate a LIF failover. &amp;nbsp;Aside from a whole node going down, will a LIF only failover if there is a link loss?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that's the case, is there any other options I can employ to protect against the upstream switch failing but NOT taking a port offline? &amp;nbsp;I can't use LACP across two switches in this environmment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steven&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130766#M28455</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven_langdale</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:07:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LIF Failover conditions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130769#M28457</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have multiple core and switch redudency,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;upstream switch failing should not be a problem in your network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ontap&amp;nbsp;is not designed to handle such failure. that should be handled in your network design.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In a NAS environment, netapp controller is not aware&amp;nbsp;or keeping track of the client status until client request reach netapp.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Let the controller do what it disigned/suppose to do rather than trying to fix everything with it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is some failover policy you can configure on your LIFs.. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1636021/html/GUID-92CC5F58-5EB8-4E2D-88F0-FA2F740062E0.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1636021/html/GUID-92CC5F58-5EB8-4E2D-88F0-FA2F740062E0.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And I can gurantee none of them handle an&amp;nbsp;upstream switch failure.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-robin.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 18:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130769#M28457</guid>
      <dc:creator>robinpeter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T18:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LIF Failover conditions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130773#M28459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that Robin, &amp;nbsp;and I'm currently looking at the network design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you confirm that LIF failover will only occure with a loss of link?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steven&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 19:31:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130773#M28459</guid>
      <dc:creator>steven_langdale</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T19:31:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LIF Failover conditions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130774#M28460</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this is what you looking for&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1196907/html/GUID-6DBD40F8-EA21-42AE-82CF-AEB556BEC783.html" target="_self"&gt;Scenarios that cause a LIF failover&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 19:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/LIF-Failover-conditions/m-p/130774#M28460</guid>
      <dc:creator>robinpeter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T19:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

