<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130859#M28481</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer page 28 on the link:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 02:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-08T02:38:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130620#M28427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I made &lt;STRONG&gt;snaplock compliance aggregate&lt;/STRONG&gt; with ONTAP 9.1 ,and create volume in the compliance aggregate.&lt;BR /&gt;Then&amp;nbsp; I halted ONTAP&amp;nbsp; to initialize all disks using boot menu No.4 , but it couldn't be initialized.&lt;BR /&gt;All aggrigate including compliance aggregate is still remained.&lt;BR /&gt;Root volume is initialized yet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'd like to know How&amp;nbsp; the compliance aggregate disks&amp;nbsp; are initialized , and is it possible to reuse them?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Disk 0b.00.10 is part of a SnapLock Compliance volume. It will not be overwritten or formatte&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;Disk 0a.00.9 is part of a SnapLock Compliance volume. It will not be overwritten or formatted&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The document "Technical FAQ SnapLock ONTAP9.0 and 9.1"&amp;nbsp; says&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"When all the WORM data has expired in a SnapLock Compliance volume, the volume can be&lt;BR /&gt;deleted."&lt;BR /&gt;"SnapLock flexible volumes on an aggregate are deleted, the aggregate can also be delete"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Technical FAQ&lt;BR /&gt;SnapLock&lt;BR /&gt;ONTAP 9.0 and 9.1&lt;BR /&gt;Siddharth Agrawal, NetApp&lt;BR /&gt;Version 1.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some volumes are still remaied on the disks and I can't delete them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130620#M28427</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:08:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130734#M28446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do not set the retention time explicitly before committing a Compliance-mode file to the WORM state, and you do not modify the defaults, the file will be retained for 30 years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ref page 12:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 08:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130734#M28446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T08:35:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130829#M28475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I set the max retention time 1 minute before createting test files.&amp;nbsp; And all files had been expired before hating .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But root volume was initialized, while compliance aggregate was not .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know how to delete volumes and the compliance&amp;nbsp; aggregate without root volume .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the disks woulb be set to other node, "aggr show" results&amp;nbsp; no entry . volumes are not shown either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know how to delte them.&amp;nbsp; Is it possible or not ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 09:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130829#M28475</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-05T09:44:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130833#M28477</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the delted compl volume shown under &amp;nbsp;"volume recovery-queue show" ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 11:20:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130833#M28477</guid>
      <dc:creator>skneo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-05T11:20:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130859#M28481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Refer page 28 on the link:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_get_file/ECMLP2507748&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 02:38:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130859#M28481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-08T02:38:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130926#M28496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No,&amp;nbsp; Initialized Volume is SVM's root volume in the normal aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because it is impossible to create SVM's root volume in the compliance aggregate,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made it in the normal aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 23:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130926#M28496</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-09T23:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130927#M28497</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can't do it in the comand line.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because SVM was deleted when initializing a normal data aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I didn't make an enterprise aggregate but a&amp;nbsp; compliance aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the priviledged delete is performed only in Enterprise mode&amp;nbsp; according to that reference In the page 26, you know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 23:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/130927#M28497</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-09T23:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131026#M28529</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We make it very difficult to remove snaplock data - on purpose.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming the system is not under support or in production, at this point I would suggest pulling the disks containing the aggr out of the system and zeroing them on a linux system (ensuring you use correct block sizes), and you should be able to re-use them after doing a zero spares. Never done it myself, but I know we check for a certain signature on the disks to determine if they are snaplock.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 03:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131026#M28529</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-15T03:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131067#M28544</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pulling the disks containing the aggr out of the system&amp;nbsp; is worth considering .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ｍ not certain this method will be successfull ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to try it after the people interested&amp;nbsp; would agree to this proposal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 03:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131067#M28544</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-16T03:02:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131686#M28681</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I tried zeroing disks on the server(IBM system x 3650) using erasing tool ,and it failed.&lt;BR /&gt;All process of zeroing were finished with no-fatal errors ,but the following scsi error occured.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;---&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;* fail scsi Disk IBM ServerRAID MF5015 2.12 837GiB(898GB) 001709a72368e8c820d0251F04b&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;---&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But this trouble was solved by other way.&lt;BR /&gt;Compliance aggregate was deleted with following ontap command .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;::*&amp;gt;volume lost-found show&lt;BR /&gt;::*&amp;gt;volume lost-found delete -node "nodename" -dsid "DSID"&lt;BR /&gt;::*&amp;gt;run -node "nodename" aggr offline "aggr name"&lt;BR /&gt;::*&amp;gt;aggr remove-stale-record -aggregate "aggr name" -nodename "nodename"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;off course it is necessary every files in compliance volumes are expired,now all of the drives are able to be reused .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In case some drive is not expired, it's impossible to be reused.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 03:29:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131686#M28681</guid>
      <dc:creator>netapping</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-08T03:29:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock Compliance aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131688#M28682</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update - glad you got it sorted out!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-Compliance-aggregate/m-p/131688#M28682</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-08T06:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

