<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fabric MetroCluster and DWDM clarification in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Fabric-MetroCluster-and-DWDM-clarification/m-p/131027#M28530</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I can't see the image in your post - so I may not understand your question fully.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you have seen in&amp;nbsp;TR-3548, we do support DWDM, as long as the device used for DWDM is compatible with the Cisco or Brocade switch used in the metrocluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this answer your question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 03:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-15T03:30:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fabric MetroCluster and DWDM clarification</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Fabric-MetroCluster-and-DWDM-clarification/m-p/130924#M28495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IHAC that is planning to implement Fabric MetroCluster using a DWDM topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DWDM is already in place and it is used by EMC VPLEX.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have read TR-3548 for Fabric MetroCLuster ISL considerations and I talked to customer in order to understand DWDM infrastructure:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- they have unused ports for attach FC ISL for NetApp on both sides&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- they can use a different lambda for NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&amp;amp;ik=839320a684&amp;amp;view=fimg&amp;amp;th=15a3f38d3a06c7bc&amp;amp;attid=0.1&amp;amp;disp=emb&amp;amp;attbid=ANGjdJ8bWLdMCBYjIbbt3NoQ4W-Pwp9ewoqZ299XXBGoo2KRFxYyuG_5zp_PdoeqbgT_y0mYFXuI2be3hvBGD_F_51HAQxVx4tEl5Nb2yw8cNYVFF82zxa3k_KdepxI&amp;amp;sz=w944-h826&amp;amp;ats=1494369286180&amp;amp;rm=15a3f38d3a06c7bc&amp;amp;zw&amp;amp;atsh=1" border="0" alt="Imagem inline 1" width="472" height="413" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK it seems a valid requirement, but I would like to confirm it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any comments?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Rafael.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Fabric-MetroCluster-and-DWDM-clarification/m-p/130924#M28495</guid>
      <dc:creator>rafaelkelles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fabric MetroCluster and DWDM clarification</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Fabric-MetroCluster-and-DWDM-clarification/m-p/131027#M28530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I can't see the image in your post - so I may not understand your question fully.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you have seen in&amp;nbsp;TR-3548, we do support DWDM, as long as the device used for DWDM is compatible with the Cisco or Brocade switch used in the metrocluster.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does this answer your question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 03:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Fabric-MetroCluster-and-DWDM-clarification/m-p/131027#M28530</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-15T03:30:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

