<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Better to have SAN and NAS SVMs Separate? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Better-to-have-SAN-and-NAS-SVMs-Separate/m-p/136740#M30135</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We are 100% NAS but recently added FC to our FAS8080 EX (cDOT 9.2)&amp;nbsp;for legacy ESXi datastores (cannot be NFS).&amp;nbsp; Should we create the FC LUNs in the same SVM as our NAS volumes or do folks tend to have separate SVMs for SAN and NAS protocols?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hello-jon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:14:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better to have SAN and NAS SVMs Separate?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Better-to-have-SAN-and-NAS-SVMs-Separate/m-p/136740#M30135</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are 100% NAS but recently added FC to our FAS8080 EX (cDOT 9.2)&amp;nbsp;for legacy ESXi datastores (cannot be NFS).&amp;nbsp; Should we create the FC LUNs in the same SVM as our NAS volumes or do folks tend to have separate SVMs for SAN and NAS protocols?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:14:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Better-to-have-SAN-and-NAS-SVMs-Separate/m-p/136740#M30135</guid>
      <dc:creator>hello-jon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:14:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better to have SAN and NAS SVMs Separate?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Better-to-have-SAN-and-NAS-SVMs-Separate/m-p/136741#M30136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Answered my own question after reading this post, separate SVMs it is!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/NAS-SVM-Seperate-NAS-LIFs-per-node/td-p/132180/jump-to/first-unread-message" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.netapp.com/t5/Network-Storage-Protocols-Discussions/NAS-SVM-Seperate-NAS-LIFs-per-node/td-p/132180/jump-to/first-unread-message&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Better-to-have-SAN-and-NAS-SVMs-Separate/m-p/136741#M30136</guid>
      <dc:creator>hello-jon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-14T18:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

