<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Aggregate Inline Deduplication Statistics in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Aggregate-Inline-Deduplication-Statistics/m-p/137790#M30387</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;First, we are running OnTAP 9.2 P2. After switching to 9.2 I enabled aggregate inline dedupication, created new datastores for our VMware environment, and worked with our VM team to get VMs moved to the new datastores. My&amp;nbsp;goal is to maximize the benefit of aggregate inline deduplication be re-writing each of the VMs. I am also putting all datastores for a particular operating system on one aggregate to also maximize the benefits (i.e. all Server 2012's on one aggregate, all 2008's on another, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue is: I'm not 100% clear on how to track the statistical changes as we migrate VMs. From what I've read in TR-4476, I believe it's saying the aggregate inline deduplication statistics are&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;combined&lt;/STRONG&gt; with the aggregate compaction statistics, however I'm not clear on this. Here's the specific quote, from page 25:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Space savings from cross-volume deduplication are reported as deduplication savings at the aggregate level. Currently, data compaction savings are also reported at the aggregate level. Savings for both compaction and cross-volume deduplication are reported combined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the command I'm running to obtain full efficiency statistics:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;storage aggregate show-efficiency -fields aggregate,volume-efficiency-saved,volume-compression-saved,volume-vbn-zero-saved,aggr-compaction-saved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the above quote, I have been assuming that&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr-compaction-saved&lt;/STRONG&gt; is actually the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;combination&lt;/STRONG&gt; of compaction + aggregate inline deduplication savings. I kept this statistic from before I started migrations, and keep watching it as I migrate. It is going up, but it would&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;anyway&lt;/STRONG&gt; if it were only showing compaction savings. I just want to verify this is the correct statistic I should be looking at.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:04:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TMADOCTHOMAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:04:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggregate Inline Deduplication Statistics</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Aggregate-Inline-Deduplication-Statistics/m-p/137790#M30387</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First, we are running OnTAP 9.2 P2. After switching to 9.2 I enabled aggregate inline dedupication, created new datastores for our VMware environment, and worked with our VM team to get VMs moved to the new datastores. My&amp;nbsp;goal is to maximize the benefit of aggregate inline deduplication be re-writing each of the VMs. I am also putting all datastores for a particular operating system on one aggregate to also maximize the benefits (i.e. all Server 2012's on one aggregate, all 2008's on another, etc.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My issue is: I'm not 100% clear on how to track the statistical changes as we migrate VMs. From what I've read in TR-4476, I believe it's saying the aggregate inline deduplication statistics are&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;combined&lt;/STRONG&gt; with the aggregate compaction statistics, however I'm not clear on this. Here's the specific quote, from page 25:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Space savings from cross-volume deduplication are reported as deduplication savings at the aggregate level. Currently, data compaction savings are also reported at the aggregate level. Savings for both compaction and cross-volume deduplication are reported combined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's the command I'm running to obtain full efficiency statistics:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;storage aggregate show-efficiency -fields aggregate,volume-efficiency-saved,volume-compression-saved,volume-vbn-zero-saved,aggr-compaction-saved&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on the above quote, I have been assuming that&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr-compaction-saved&lt;/STRONG&gt; is actually the&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;combination&lt;/STRONG&gt; of compaction + aggregate inline deduplication savings. I kept this statistic from before I started migrations, and keep watching it as I migrate. It is going up, but it would&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;anyway&lt;/STRONG&gt; if it were only showing compaction savings. I just want to verify this is the correct statistic I should be looking at.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:04:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Aggregate-Inline-Deduplication-Statistics/m-p/137790#M30387</guid>
      <dc:creator>TMADOCTHOMAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:04:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

