<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SPM - degraded performance in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SPM-degraded-performance/m-p/138981#M30675</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Degraded performance OK on HA takeover event Depends on the customer’s need This is a checkbox option. The default position is for the checkbox to be selected, which means that some degree of performance degradation is acceptable if a storage controller in an HA pair is down for a short time. The storage HA pair operates with degraded performance until the failed HA partner is brought back up. If this checkbox is deselected, storage performance is maintained while a storage controller in an HA pair is down. SPM reserves 50% of system resources to guarantee the performance. SPM might recommend additional storage controller HA pairs because of the 50% system resource reservation. Note: When you configure this option, it is important to consider the customer’s requirements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer Page 17 in the link: &lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4190.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4190.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-20T05:58:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SPM - degraded performance</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SPM-degraded-performance/m-p/138980#M30674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In SPM tool , if I disable or enable the option "Degrded Performance" in hardware setting, what is the difference between output ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what kind of performance was degraded and what happend if I enable degraded performance ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SPM-degraded-performance/m-p/138980#M30674</guid>
      <dc:creator>rogerlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:54:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SPM - degraded performance</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SPM-degraded-performance/m-p/138981#M30675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Degraded performance OK on HA takeover event Depends on the customer’s need This is a checkbox option. The default position is for the checkbox to be selected, which means that some degree of performance degradation is acceptable if a storage controller in an HA pair is down for a short time. The storage HA pair operates with degraded performance until the failed HA partner is brought back up. If this checkbox is deselected, storage performance is maintained while a storage controller in an HA pair is down. SPM reserves 50% of system resources to guarantee the performance. SPM might recommend additional storage controller HA pairs because of the 50% system resource reservation. Note: When you configure this option, it is important to consider the customer’s requirements.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Refer Page 17 in the link: &lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4190.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-4190.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 05:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SPM-degraded-performance/m-p/138981#M30675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-20T05:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

