<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Deleting a qtree without it entering snapshots in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140009#M30938</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, I could have given more details. Yes, the qtree had been around for a while, so there is a large snapshot on that volume now. I'll look at it more closely to see if deleting that snapshot makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 15:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jamyles</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-03T15:06:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deleting a qtree without it entering snapshots</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140004#M30936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently had a qtree that was quite large and deserved to be its own volume (3 TB, 25 million files), so I migrated it. That all worked fine but when I did a 'qtree delete' to clean up the original volume I realized this would all be going straight into snapshots (and then into vault snapshots, in my case) so I'd be carrying that extra 3 TB for a long time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to avoid this? I realize it goes against the philosophy of snapshots but also realize there could be something I'm not thinking of. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:45:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140004#M30936</guid>
      <dc:creator>jamyles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:45:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deleting a qtree without it entering snapshots</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140006#M30937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is not "going into snapshot". If it is already in snapshot, there is nothing you can do except deleting snapshot(s). If it is not in any snapshot (i.e. qtree was created after most recent snapshot had been taken) then deleting it will not cause it magically be moved into existing snapshot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 14:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140006#M30937</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T14:09:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deleting a qtree without it entering snapshots</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140009#M30938</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ah, I could have given more details. Yes, the qtree had been around for a while, so there is a large snapshot on that volume now. I'll look at it more closely to see if deleting that snapshot makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 15:06:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deleting-a-qtree-without-it-entering-snapshots/m-p/140009#M30938</guid>
      <dc:creator>jamyles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-03T15:06:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

