<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Cross-SVM clones in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cross-SVM-clones/m-p/140513#M31072</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi FOlk,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We're on 9.2P3, and we discovered to our pleasure that it is possible to create clones on a different VServer to the parent!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vol clone create -vserver svm1 -flexclone stutest2 -type RW -parent-vserver svm2 -parent-volume stutest01 &lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is anyone else using this function?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess the catch is that have to make sure that your clones don't degrade the performance of the parent volume (or other vols on the aggregate)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OZWALKERZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:40:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-SVM clones</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cross-SVM-clones/m-p/140513#M31072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi FOlk,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We're on 9.2P3, and we discovered to our pleasure that it is possible to create clones on a different VServer to the parent!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;vol clone create -vserver svm1 -flexclone stutest2 -type RW -parent-vserver svm2 -parent-volume stutest01 &lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is anyone else using this function?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I guess the catch is that have to make sure that your clones don't degrade the performance of the parent volume (or other vols on the aggregate)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:40:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cross-SVM-clones/m-p/140513#M31072</guid>
      <dc:creator>OZWALKERZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:40:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Cross-SVM clones</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cross-SVM-clones/m-p/140640#M31094</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NetApp making an effort to take most of the serial operations down to very granular levels (forgot the name they call it, but it's stripes of blocks). so a single object like File LUN. Volume. Aggregate are less&amp;nbsp;commonly to be a&amp;nbsp;bottleneck&amp;nbsp;unless it goes all the way down to the disk (e.g the disk is very busy)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gidi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Cross-SVM-clones/m-p/140640#M31094</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-31T17:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

