<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Snaplock aggregate expansion in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-aggregate-expansion/m-p/141385#M31282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to expand (add new disks) to Snaplock Enterprise or Snaplock Compliance aggregates?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe on 7-mode it was possible but reallocation on it was not supported. What's the status with ONTAP 9.3/9.4 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcinlub</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snaplock aggregate expansion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-aggregate-expansion/m-p/141385#M31282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to expand (add new disks) to Snaplock Enterprise or Snaplock Compliance aggregates?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I believe on 7-mode it was possible but reallocation on it was not supported. What's the status with ONTAP 9.3/9.4 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-aggregate-expansion/m-p/141385#M31282</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcinlub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snaplock aggregate expansion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-aggregate-expansion/m-p/141398#M31287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We can expand the enterprise snaplock aggregate..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if your talking about aggregate relatocate (arl) then&amp;nbsp; it supports&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Once the aggregate moves to the destination node, VCC(volume compliance clock) of all the SnapLock volumes hosted on&lt;BR /&gt;that aggregate is reassociated with the new host node’s SCC(system compliance clock time), resulting in the loss of some clock ticks.&lt;BR /&gt;This does not skew VCC too much as compared to SCC. VCC will lose some ticks until the volume&lt;BR /&gt;moves to the partner node.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 19:25:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snaplock-aggregate-expansion/m-p/141398#M31287</guid>
      <dc:creator>naveens17</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-10T19:25:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

