<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144405#M31998</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if there is the ability to partition a half shelf.&amp;nbsp; You might have to open a case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but partitions need to be viewed in adv or diag mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;set d&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;partition show&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 12:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-02T12:06:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144399#M31995</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello NTAP_community&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have a AFF300 with Ontap 9.3P5, it was delivered with a full shelf of 3.8TB SSD's. The system has root-data-data partitioning. After 6 months as our VMware storage we need extra headroom. So I have aquired half a shelf of 3.8TB.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But I can't seem to find a way to get them partitioned in the same manor. I assigned them to node1 via :&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" face="courier new,courier"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;cluster1::&amp;gt; storage disk assign -disk 1.2.* -owner node1&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have tried to use:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" face="courier new,courier"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;cluster1::&amp;gt; storage disk assign -disk 1.2.* -owner node1 -data1 true&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&lt;FONT size="4" face="courier new,courier"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Error: invalid argument "-data1"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;I can't seem to find where to get this fixed. There is one spare disk which has the correct root-data-data partiotion, can this disk be used to force raid-grp creation?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV style="left: 511.707px; top: 249.034px; font-size: 15px; font-family: monospace; transform: scaleX(1);"&gt;&lt;FONT face="helvetica"&gt;I would like to spread the load between the 2 nodes. If I use the full disks node1 will have approx twice the load of node2.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 01:10:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144399#M31995</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-02T01:10:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144405#M31998</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if there is the ability to partition a half shelf.&amp;nbsp; You might have to open a case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but partitions need to be viewed in adv or diag mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;set d&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;partition show&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 12:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144405#M31998</guid>
      <dc:creator>JGPSHNTAP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-02T12:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144406#M31999</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see that under advanced mode i get the option data1, when using tab completion&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;cluster1::&amp;gt; storage disk assign -data1 true -all true -node node1 -owner node1 &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;I'm opening a case with NetApp Support, a bit reserved towards doing this in my prod system without knowing full well all consequences.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;\Arne&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/11560"&gt;@JGPSHNTAP&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure if there is the ability to partition a half shelf.&amp;nbsp; You might have to open a case.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but partitions need to be viewed in adv or diag mode&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;set d&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;partition show&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 12:52:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144406#M31999</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-02T12:52:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144461#M32008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Root-data-data partitioning supported with up to 48 drives. Therefore,&amp;nbsp;you should be able to do it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assign your physical disks to controllers and then add them to your aggregates without trying to partition them first. The system should partition them for you automatically, while you add them to an&amp;nbsp;existing aggregate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Use &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;-simulate true&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; argument first, to check the system going to do it properly and as you expect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just to make sure:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;NetApp recommends having&amp;nbsp;all the RAID groups in your aggregate with the same disk size except for the least one. In the last RAID group should be at least half of the size of the&amp;nbsp;previous RAID groups. I.e. if you have one aggregate consisting out one RAID group (23 drives: 21 data + 2 parity) then you should add to next RAID group at least 12 SSD to make your last RAID group no less than half of previous.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And it looks like you should meet those requirements. Just to clarify, do not add just 3 drives to the new RAID group with existing 23.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 15:00:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144461#M32008</guid>
      <dc:creator>Damien_Queen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-17T15:00:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144502#M32020</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="3"&gt;As I can't seem to get my system to use root-data-data partitioning (ADPv2 Iguess?)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="3"&gt;Here is what I propose to do. I'm trying to get a validation from NetApp on this.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;clus1::&amp;gt; storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate&amp;nbsp;aggr1 -raidgroup new -disklist 6.1.23,6.2.0,6.2.1,6.2.2,6.2.3,6.2.4,6.2.5,6.2.6,6.2.7,6.2.8,6.2.9,6.2.10 -simulate true&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;Disks would be added to aggregate "aggr1" on node "clus1" in the following manner:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;First Plex&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;RAID Group rg1, 12 disks (block checksum, raid_dp)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; Position&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Disk&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Type&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Size&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; ---------- ------------------------- ---------- ---------------&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.1.23&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.0&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; -&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.1&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.2&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.3&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.4&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.5&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.6&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.7&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.8&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.9&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt; shared&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;6.2.10&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; SSD&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1.72TB&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;Aggregate capacity available for volume use would be increased by 15.48TB.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;The following disks would be partitioned: 6.2.0, 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.3, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, 6.2.6,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;6.2.7, 6.2.8, 6.2.9, 6.2.10.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier" size="2"&gt;clus1::&amp;gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="andale mono,times" size="3"&gt;Any thoughts?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 23:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/144502#M32020</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-06T23:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/147986#M32957</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Arne,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you manage to solve this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am in a similar situation. I am only adding 2 drives to a shelf which currently only has 12 drives. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/147986#M32957</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohammedimrankhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-15T13:48:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/147999#M32960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used the solution described twice. It works without problems. Keep In mind that the limit is 48 drives. You can use the existing spare drive to partition the new drives as I did in my example.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best of luck to you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Arne&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:52:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/147999#M32960</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-16T10:52:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/148003#M32962</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/148003#M32962</guid>
      <dc:creator>mohammedimrankhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-16T11:49:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ontap 9.x root-data-data partitioning discussion</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/169244#M38841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Doesn't this result in what was a spare (6.1.23) becoming a disk within the newly created rg1?&amp;nbsp; Are you left without a spare?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 20:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Ontap-9-x-root-data-data-partitioning-discussion/m-p/169244#M38841</guid>
      <dc:creator>hal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-16T20:04:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

