<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dedude Ratio in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144700#M32097</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is very much a "How high is up?" question.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have an AFF A700, and a FAS 9000 with only ESX hosts attached running Ontap 9.4P1. The A700 has all efficiency functions enabled, the FAS9000 is only using inline compression/compaction.&amp;nbsp; Both arrays are delivering block level services via FC, with no filer protocols in use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some guests have data that has already been significantly compressed/deduped, and for these even 1.15:1 is reasonable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On some other guests I have seen 2.5:1 just with compression/compaction.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Those numbers are without snapshots or cloning.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I look at efficiency with regard to placing things on the flash or spinning disk unit. If it doesn't need high IOPS/low latency, and it isn't very efficient, it goes on spinning disks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ZaphodBbx</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-15T18:20:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dedude Ratio</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144672#M32091</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What are the average dedupe ration for an 100% vmware deployment.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:06:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144672#M32091</guid>
      <dc:creator>lethaniel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:06:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dedude Ratio</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144700#M32097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is very much a "How high is up?" question.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have an AFF A700, and a FAS 9000 with only ESX hosts attached running Ontap 9.4P1. The A700 has all efficiency functions enabled, the FAS9000 is only using inline compression/compaction.&amp;nbsp; Both arrays are delivering block level services via FC, with no filer protocols in use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some guests have data that has already been significantly compressed/deduped, and for these even 1.15:1 is reasonable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On some other guests I have seen 2.5:1 just with compression/compaction.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Those numbers are without snapshots or cloning.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I look at efficiency with regard to placing things on the flash or spinning disk unit. If it doesn't need high IOPS/low latency, and it isn't very efficient, it goes on spinning disks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144700#M32097</guid>
      <dc:creator>ZaphodBbx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-15T18:20:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dedude Ratio</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144705#M32098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;All depends on the data.&amp;nbsp; Some applications will dedupe better than others.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What's your workload(s); SQL, Exchange, VDI, Oracle?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144705#M32098</guid>
      <dc:creator>SpindleNinja</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-15T22:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dedude Ratio</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144706#M32099</link>
      <description>Hi lethaniel,
I can report from "the field" that we have deduplication and compresssion ratios between 1,52 to 3,54. It depends on the data. If you have a "normal" VMWare Environment with DC,Exchange, FileServer, SQL, and so on, an Efficiency Ratio of 2:1 is absolutly realistic. If you have Medical Data like PACS it will be unrealistic. 

Kind regards 
Andre</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:43:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Dedude-Ratio/m-p/144706#M32099</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndreUnterberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-15T22:43:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

