<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inquire about various experiences related to Flash Pool in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Inquire-about-various-experiences-related-to-Flash-Pool/m-p/147882#M32922</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/70156"&gt;@sdyoon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can try to using AWA (&lt;SPAN&gt;Automated Working Set Analyser&lt;/SPAN&gt;) to sizing how many cache capacity you need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Max Projected Cache Size&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The size at which the SSD cache would hold every eligible data block that was requested from disk during the AWA run. Note that this does not guarantee a hit for all future I/O operations, because they might request data that is not in the cache. However, if the workload during the AWA run was a typical one, and if your budget allows for it, this would be an ideal size for your Flash Pool cache.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg%2FGUID-2C3EC0DF-FEFE-4871-A161-4A3BAC87DB69.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg%2FGUID-2C3EC0DF-FEFE-4871-A161-4A3BAC87DB69.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930%2Fstorage__automated-working-set-analyzer__show.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930%2Fstorage__automated-working-set-analyzer__show.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>christsai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-11T02:41:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inquire about various experiences related to Flash Pool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Inquire-about-various-experiences-related-to-Flash-Pool/m-p/147736#M32890</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;BR /&gt;I need help about NetApp Flashpool.&lt;BR /&gt;I need help about FlashPool Sizing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently, the system is configured as below.&lt;BR /&gt;FAS8060 (2 node Cluster)&lt;BR /&gt;1. Aggregate_n1 = 85 TB usable with 1 TB flashpool&lt;BR /&gt;2. Aggregate_n2 = 85TB usable with 1 TB flashpool&lt;BR /&gt;3. Only FCP Use.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Question 1.&lt;BR /&gt;What is the ratio of Usable Size to Flashpool Size?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I looked for the material,&amp;nbsp;No appropriate rate data was found.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Questuon 2.&lt;BR /&gt;The hit ratio of FlashPool is shown as below.&lt;BR /&gt;I wonder if the values ​​below are appropriate or insufficient.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Average Read Hit = 27% (service normal time) ~ 34.1% (Service peak time)&lt;BR /&gt;Average Write Hit = 39.8% (service normal time) ~ 42.2% (Service peak time)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is server virtualization based on VMware, and it provides various services such as WEB, DB, and APP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have tried the NetAPP SR,&amp;nbsp;Not receiving the right answer.&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to get some advice on your various experiences.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;yoon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Inquire-about-various-experiences-related-to-Flash-Pool/m-p/147736#M32890</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdyoon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inquire about various experiences related to Flash Pool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Inquire-about-various-experiences-related-to-Flash-Pool/m-p/147882#M32922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/70156"&gt;@sdyoon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can try to using AWA (&lt;SPAN&gt;Automated Working Set Analyser&lt;/SPAN&gt;) to sizing how many cache capacity you need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Max Projected Cache Size&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The size at which the SSD cache would hold every eligible data block that was requested from disk during the AWA run. Note that this does not guarantee a hit for all future I/O operations, because they might request data that is not in the cache. However, if the workload during the AWA run was a typical one, and if your budget allows for it, this would be an ideal size for your Flash Pool cache.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg%2FGUID-2C3EC0DF-FEFE-4871-A161-4A3BAC87DB69.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-psmg%2FGUID-2C3EC0DF-FEFE-4871-A161-4A3BAC87DB69.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930%2Fstorage__automated-working-set-analyzer__show.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.dot-cm-cmpr-930%2Fstorage__automated-working-set-analyzer__show.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Inquire-about-various-experiences-related-to-Flash-Pool/m-p/147882#M32922</guid>
      <dc:creator>christsai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T02:41:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

