<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Advanced disk partition for FAS8200 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/149019#M33160</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/38137"&gt;@GidonMarcus&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you for the quick help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-19T09:41:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Advanced disk partition for FAS8200</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/148902#M33133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Experts,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have 4 Disk Shelfs (all SAS) and we would like to use ADP:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My assumptions on ADP: It will partation disk into 2 slices root and data partation, all the Data partation is used to create aggregates, how the spare works? what happens if the disk fails?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;what if the new Disk Shelf expanction is done, will it automatically convert disks into ADP?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What are the Limitations and disadvantages fased in the real Production Environments?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your Comments...!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:28:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/148902#M33133</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T12:28:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Advanced disk partition for FAS8200</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/148909#M33136</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The split can also be to two data partitions (depends on the disk size and type) this is to allow a better split between nodes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can see the exact configuration it will create per disk type and count in HWU &lt;A href="https://hwu.netapp.com" target="_blank"&gt;https://hwu.netapp.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;(select&amp;nbsp;platform &amp;gt; FAS &amp;gt; model &amp;gt; OS &amp;gt; and when the results&amp;nbsp;displayed look for the line "ADP Root Partition Configuration"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;there are partitioned spares - and non&amp;nbsp;partitioned spares in the system. you can see the configuration in the table of HWU. in general the system will try to always&amp;nbsp;keep that number of spare partitioned drives, by partitioning a non-partitioned spare disk.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;New disks added to the selves are&amp;nbsp;assigned to a node just show as normal spares - they only try to partition under the following terms:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1001793" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/app/answers/answer_view/a_id/1001793&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;seems that if you add a disk to a RAID group with partitioned drives, it will try to partition that drive as well&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMLP2427462/html/GUID-67EE20CC-446F-44B2-8164-E31CDC879839.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMLP2427462/html/GUID-67EE20CC-446F-44B2-8164-E31CDC879839.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i'm not aware of wide limitation. it may force the&amp;nbsp;RAID configuration to look a bit&amp;nbsp;different then you planned (like if your system can only have 24 partitioned disks - you being forced to have&amp;nbsp;something like 11 or 22 disks in RAID group, compare to an old standard of let's say - 16)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gidi&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/148909#M33136</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-16T21:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Advanced disk partition for FAS8200</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/149019#M33160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/38137"&gt;@GidonMarcus&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thank you for the quick help.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:41:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Advanced-disk-partition-for-FAS8200/m-p/149019#M33160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T09:41:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

