<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Group Policy Objects and Ontap 9.6 (or newer) in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153659#M34376</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;After doing a little bit more talking, we'll probably go straight for Kerberos for NFS authentication.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RandomStorage</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-21T09:01:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Group Policy Objects and Ontap 9.6 (or newer)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153588#M34355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to find out how how things will behave in the following scenario.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3 SVM's and machine objects, all stored in the same OU in Active Directory&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1 SVM is pure SMB/CIFS, 1 SVM is pure NFS, and 1 SVM is mixed with both CIFS &amp;amp; NFS access to the same data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) GPO Policy is applied to the OU that contains all 3 machine objects mentioned above. What happens / how do each of those 3 SVM's behave ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- For the first one i assume everything works like it should (assuming, GPO's are enabled and the GPO contains supported GPO settings)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- For the second one i assume the GPO is just ignored (GPO-support might not be possible to enable on a NFS SVM, and it might not be added to AD as a machine object anyways)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- For the third, how does this handle ? Assuming GPO-support is turned on, will it only used the GPO's for access coming from CIFS/SMB Clients, or will GPO's also have any effect on access from the NFS side of things ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153588#M34355</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandomStorage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group Policy Objects and Ontap 9.6 (or newer)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153615#M34363</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need a bit more:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Security style of volumes/qtrees of 2 and 3.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) How are you handling NFS authentication?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think NFS directly will be affected, unless you're mapping from Windows security style and using AD for that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153615#M34363</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-17T22:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group Policy Objects and Ontap 9.6 (or newer)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153646#M34369</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since this is a solution that is not implemented yet, nothing is 100% set in stone, and things could change.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1) Volumes and qtrees will probably have mostly either "Unix" or "Mixed" security style.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2) With regards to NFS authentication, early on it will probably only be IP-filtering, but later on it will probably be Kerberos based.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm mostly trying to figure out how it works, more than figuring out "how to make it work", if that makes sense.&amp;nbsp; Someone could argue that what is the point of trying to log something like file-change, or file-access, if you only log it from CIFS, and not from NFS, if both NFS and CIFS are using/changing the files anyway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153646#M34369</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandomStorage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-20T15:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Group Policy Objects and Ontap 9.6 (or newer)</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153659#M34376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;After doing a little bit more talking, we'll probably go straight for Kerberos for NFS authentication.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:01:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Group-Policy-Objects-and-Ontap-9-6-or-newer/m-p/153659#M34376</guid>
      <dc:creator>RandomStorage</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-21T09:01:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

