<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155679#M35099</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The simulator is limited to 56 drives. The SSD drive size limit is 500MB and the HDD is limited to 9GB. IPartner is trying to build a simulator that will allow testing FlashPools, SnapDiff and copy-to-cloud. I have real NetApp systems, just not all flash.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:12:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>philipb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:12:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155679#M35099</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The simulator is limited to 56 drives. The SSD drive size limit is 500MB and the HDD is limited to 9GB. IPartner is trying to build a simulator that will allow testing FlashPools, SnapDiff and copy-to-cloud. I have real NetApp systems, just not all flash.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:12:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155679#M35099</guid>
      <dc:creator>philipb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:12:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155689#M35103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why not try ONTAP select?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.netapp.com/us/forms/tools/90-day-trial-of-ontap-select.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.netapp.com/us/forms/tools/90-day-trial-of-ontap-select.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155689#M35103</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T09:43:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155693#M35106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Or even CVO would be perfect since you can do Fabricpool on that.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155693#M35106</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T14:37:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155696#M35109</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is the best solution. Confirming my thoughts&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155696#M35109</guid>
      <dc:creator>philipb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T15:29:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155697#M35110</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Paul, that would involve paying for disks.&amp;nbsp; Partner said Select is the best option.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Phil&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155697#M35110</guid>
      <dc:creator>philipb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T15:30:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Looking for ONTAP Simulator with larger configuration limits to test FabricPool</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155698#M35111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;9.7 does allow for using a different aggregate, so you could set up a SSD aggr and HDD aggr in CVO. I'm not sure of cost, but I was just presenting an alternate option besides Select (if it didn't work for some reason).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:33:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Looking-for-ONTAP-Simulator-with-larger-configuration-limits-to-test-FabricPool/m-p/155698#M35111</guid>
      <dc:creator>paul_stejskal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-23T15:33:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

