<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Metrocluster in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Metrocluster/m-p/156267#M35908</link>
    <description>7-Mode MetroCluster *is* simple HA pair.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2020 06:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-17T06:48:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Metrocluster</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Metrocluster/m-p/156263#M35907</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In two-node (FMC) configuration (7mode MetroCluster) ontap 8.2.&lt;BR /&gt;When one node went offline another taken over the services but I don't see metrocluster switchover has happened and seems as simple HA pair when one goes down another will be in Node1takenover&amp;gt; to serve data to the client. Have you seen a similar setup if yes, please share your experience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:09:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Metrocluster/m-p/156263#M35907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Noorain02</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:09:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Metrocluster</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Metrocluster/m-p/156267#M35908</link>
      <description>7-Mode MetroCluster *is* simple HA pair.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2020 06:48:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Metrocluster/m-p/156267#M35908</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-17T06:48:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

