<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2143#M361</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I snapvault the qtree residing on a 32-bit aggregate using Ontap 8.0.1 to a qtree residing on a 64-bit aggregate with Ontap 8.0.1. If it is possible to do, then what are the pros and cons of this approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also hoping to run inline compression on the snapvault filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sunil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sunilvarghese1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:51:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2143#M361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I snapvault the qtree residing on a 32-bit aggregate using Ontap 8.0.1 to a qtree residing on a 64-bit aggregate with Ontap 8.0.1. If it is possible to do, then what are the pros and cons of this approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also hoping to run inline compression on the snapvault filer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sunil&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:51:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2143#M361</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunilvarghese1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:51:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2148#M364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You just create snapvault relationship as usual. SnapVault between 32 and 64 bit aggregates is fully supported. I do not see any pros and cons specifically related to large aggregates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course you can enable compression on SV secondary if you have correspondent license.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:01:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2148#M364</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-09T15:01:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2156#M368</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you plan on doing ndmp backups from the snapvault filer, check the BURT out before implementing (and there is a PVR process to approve compression too) since there is an issue (I don't see fixed in 8.0.2 yet either) with ndmp dumps on compressed volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 16:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2156#M368</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-09T16:55:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2164#M372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does compression need PVR? I thought it was released in 8.0.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:47:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2164#M372</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-09T20:47:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2169#M375</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;still needs a pvr for the key but should be no pvr with 8.1 later this year.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 21:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2169#M375</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-09T21:30:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2177#M380</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Scott,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the impact of flexclone and mounting the snapvaulted compressed volumes to a server and then sending it to backups to&amp;nbsp; tape. When it is read sequentially will it uncompress the data and then send to tape where it is compressed via the backup software?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 04:08:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2177#M380</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunilvarghese1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-10T04:08:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Snapvault between 32 bit aggregate to 64 bit aggregate</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2182#M383</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;NDMP (dump) will uncompress the data, but because of the BURT don't do local NDMP backups of a compressed volume since it is a severity 1 bug listed as data corruption &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=485411" target="_blank"&gt;https://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&amp;amp;Display=485411&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Since a flexclone would also be compressed data, the issue would still exist since it is still compressed data on disk.&amp;nbsp; The workarouds are in the link to either use 3-way ndmp (no tape on the fas controller with the compressed volume), snapmirror to tape or not use ndmp.&amp;nbsp; NDMP/dump will read sequentially and uncompress.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-between-32-bit-aggregate-to-64-bit-aggregate/m-p/2182#M383</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-10T05:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

